Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/220 Oak Street Tenants Association

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez July 1, 2005 02:20 (UTC)

[edit] 220 Oak Street Tenants Association

No Vote: Was listed for speedy delete with reason stated as WP is not a soapbox or a webhost. This is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. See WP:CSD. Also see WP:DP where it states problem as "Is not suitable for Wikipedia (see WP:NOT)", should be VfD. Under WP:NOT is Wikipedia is not a soapbox and not a host. I'm all for reducing VfD load, but this is not a valid candidate for speedy. --Durin 15:55, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy under criteria 1.2.4, attempt to contact individuals named in title. --Xcali 16:25, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: How is it an attempt to contact the tenants association? It does list how to contact them, which if the article passes VfD should probably be removed or at least restructured, but it's not an attempt to contact them. --Durin 18:56, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: It's an attempt to contect the (potential) members of the association. --Xcali 19:17, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: Seems a bit of a stretch to me. Let's let this go as a VfD. It probably won't pass anyways, and if it does it can still be reworded away from that possible interpretation. --Durin 20:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, advertising. - Mgm|^(talk) 17:45, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete advertising. JamesBurns 03:21, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't have any pizza included. --ben dummett 06:29, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.