Talk:Vita (Nanoha)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.


Contents

[edit] Arrogance?

IMHO, I think Vita's just having difficulties to pronounce Nanoha's name and not out of arrogance. In episode 5, she clearly shouts in frustration about how difficult Nanoha's name is to pronounce. Dr. Rondart 18:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mindless Programs?

However, what the Time-Space Administration Bureau (TSAB) knows that they do not is that the Wolkenritter are supposed to be simply mindless programs, but Hayate's love and caring turned them into three-dimensional beings with every emotion.

Removed this sentence. IMHO, this is what the TSAB observed based on their encounters with the Wolkenritter in the past. You can tell that the Wolkenritter had emotions in the very beginning of Episode 6, before Hayate did anything but faint on seeing them activated. You also notice that Signum and Shamal immediately told Vita not to show any emotion so as not to displease their new master. This suggests that they had emotions, just that their past experiences suggested they should suppress such emotions. Kazuaki Shimazaki 00:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Powers badly misrepresented.

After going through A's just because I could, I found that a lot of the names/descriptions for Vita's powers and abilities were mislabeled, not respresented, or just plain wrong.

I'm fairly certain I straightened it all out now, but if there are still errors, go ahead and correct them. I just want to make sure this is a viable electronic resource for anyone who wants good info on the series.

Ourobourosrat 23:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] In love with Hayate?

She is the most devoted of the three to Hayate Yagami, their mistress, and appears to be in love with her.

This is not the kind of objective statement as befits Wikipedia. Opinions on that may vary and I personally never considered Vita's affection for Hayate to be romantic in nature throughout the anime. She certainly is devoted to Hayate, but I thought it to be the kind of love towards an older sister or close friend. To me, Vita's personality is far too child-like and immature to even consider romantic feelings on her part.

I'm taking out the 'appears to be in love with her' part. It's enough if this is mentioned once in the article, and with the manga reference, it makes more sense. Quizer 18:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Honestly, I bought the Nanoha A manga just to see where the heck that romantic affection was. There was maybe one ambigious scene, but I conclude that it was a matter of drawing style of a touching (but not romantic) scene. Taking the continuity as a whole, there's no evidence it was anything more than platonic. --Kazuaki Shimazaki 00:11, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] LGBT Status

Why exactly is she listed as LGBT? VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 03:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Removed her LGBT status, as there seems to be no evidence for inclusion. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 03:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Vita-Nanoha.JPG

Image:Vita-Nanoha.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)