Talk:Visual literacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? Class: This article has not been assigned a class according to the assessment scale.
Socrates
Philosophy Portal
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Articles for deletion

This article was nominated for deletion on 291205. The result of the discussion was keep. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

[edit] Some suggestions

Nice job expanding this stub. Your project is now listed at Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects#Oregon_State_University. Some advice:

  • those of you who have not registered may consider doing so, as this can prove to your teachers that it was you who has done the editing. After registering, you may also claim those anonimous edits for your accounts.
  • when you are editing, try using Wikipedia:Summary box
  • you may want to link referenced (cited) works with the places in text that are actually reffering to them using Wikipedia:Footnotes
  • some of the images (Image:WWIIAdvertisement.jpg. Image:Warcost.gif, Image:2002-sales-product-category-chart.jpg, Image:Budweiser ad.jpg and Image:Advertisement.jpg) you uploaded have no Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and thus will be deleted soon unless you can provide relevant information

Keep up the good job. If you want, you can ask for more comments on Wikipedia:Peer review. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 14:27, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] original research?

I'd like to encourage editors of this article carefully to review the Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:No original research. It appears to me that much of the current content of this article is "original research" in the sense prohibited by the policy -- that is, it's novel and unattributed media criticism, rather than an encyclopedia article reporting well-accepted fact. The mere presence of citations to the web sites and media discussed does not make this critical discussion anything but original research. Discussion is welcome, but I think in the end much of this content will end up needing to be heavily modified, deleted, or severely cut. -- Rbellin|Talk 21:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

I have removed the original material which it seemed to me was unlikely to be revised into useful encyclopedic article content. -- Rbellin|Talk 19:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)