Viriathus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Statue of Viriathus, at Viseu, Portugal
Statue of Viriathus, at Viseu, Portugal

Viriathus (known as Viriato in Portuguese and Spanish) (? - 139 BC) was the most important leader of the Lusitanian people that resisted Roman expansion into the regions of Western Iberia ], as the Romans would call it), where the Roman province of Lusitania would be established (in the areas comprising Portugal, south of the Douro river, and Extremadura in Spain). Viriathus led the Lusitanians to several victories over the Romans between 147 BC and 139 BC before he was betrayed to the Romans and killed. Of him, Theodor Mommsen said "It seemed as if, in that thoroughly prosaic age, one of the Homeric heroes had reappeared."

Contents

[edit] Etymology

There are several possible etymologies for the name Viriathus.[1] The name can be composed of two elements: Viri and Athus. Viri may come from:

  • the Indo-European root *uiros, "man", relating to strength and virility;
  • the Celtic *uiro- 'man'; and the older forms viros, viri, viro, viron from which derived the Old Irish word for man, fir;[2]
  • from *uei-, as in in the viriae or Celtiberian "twisted armbands" used by warriors (Pliny XXIII, 39);[3]
  • the Latin viri meaning man, hero, person of courage, honor, and nobility.


According to the historian Schulten Viriathus had a Celtic name. [4]

[edit] Viriathus' life

“ For he was, as is agreed by all, valiant in dangers, prudent and careful in providing whatever was necessary, and that which was most considerable of all was, that whilst he commanded he was more beloved than ever any was before him.
~ Diodorus Siculus		 ”


Little is known about Viriathus. The only reference to the location of his native tribe was made by the Greek historian Diodorus Siculus who claims he was from the Lusitanian tribes of the ocean side.

He belonged to the class of warriors, the occupation of the minority ruling elites. He was known to the Romans as the dux of the Lusitanian army, as the adsertor, protector, of Hispania" [5], or as an imperator [6] probably of the confederated Lusitanian and Celtiberian tribes.[7]

Livy described him as a shepherd who became a hunter, then a soldier, thus following the path of most young warriors, the iuventus, who devoted themselves to cattle raiding, hunting and war.[8]

According to Appian[9], Viriathus was one of the few who escaped when Galba, the Roman consul, massacred the flos iuventutis, the flower of the youth Lusitanian warriors[10], in 150 BC.

Two years after the massacre ,in 148 BC, Viriathus becomes the leader of a Lusitanian army.

Viriathus was thought, by some, to have a very obscure origin[11] although Diodorus Siculus also says that Viriathus "approved himself to be a prince" and that he said he was "lord and owner of all". [12] His family was unknown to the Romans who were familiar with the native aristocratic warrior society. His personality and his physical and intellectual abilities as well as his skills as a warrior were described by several authors. He was a man of great physical strength, probably in the very prime of life, an excellent strategist [13] owner of a brilliant mind.[11] Some authors claim that the ancient authors described Viriathus with the precise features of a Celtic king.[14]

He was described as a man who followed the principles of honesty and fair dealing and was acknowledged for being exact and faithful to his word on the treaties and leagues he made.[12] Livy gives him the title of vir duxque magnus[15] with the implied qualities that were nothing more than the ideals of the ancient virtues.[16]

A more modern current claims Viriathus belonged to an aristocratic Lusitanian clan who were owners of cattle.[17] For Cassios Dio he did not pursue power, or wealth and he carried on the war for the sake of military glory. His aims could then be compared to pure roman aristocratic ideals of that time: to serve and gain military glory and honor.[18] He did not not have, like common soldiers, to fight for war spoils, for material gain.[19]


The Lusitanians honored Viriathus as their Benefactor, (Greek:evergetes),[20] and Savior, (Greek:soter ),[21] the same titles of honor used by the kings of the Hellenistic Ptolemaic ruling dynasties.[22]


Some authors defend he probably was from the Herminius Mons (Serra da Estrela) - in the heart of Lusitania, (in central Portugal) or Beira Alta.

Most of his life and his war against the Romans are part of legend and Viriathus is considered the earliest Portuguese national hero, given the fact that he was the leader of the confederate tribes of Iberia who resisted Rome. The historian Appianus of Alexandria in his book about Iberia (in the section "Historia Romana", Roman History), commented that Viriathus killed numerous Romans and showed great skill.

[edit] The Viriathus of Silius Italicus

It has been argued that Silius Italicus, in his epic poem entitled Punica,[23] mentions a former Viriathus who would have been a contemporary of Hannibal [24]. He is referenced as primo Viriathus in aeuo, and was a leader of the Gallaeci and of the Lusitanians. The historical Viriathus, would be the one who received the title of, regnator Hiberae magnanimus terrae, the most magnanimous king of the Iberian land. [25]

[edit] Conquest of Lusitania by Rome

In the 3rd century BC, Rome started its conquest of the Iberian Peninsula. The Roman conquest of Iberia began during the Second Punic War, when the senate sent an army to Iberia to block Carthaginian re-enforcements from helping Hannibal in the Italian Peninsula. This began Roman involvement in 250 years of subsequent fighting throughout the Iberia resulting in its eventual conquest in 19 BC with the end of the Cantabrian Wars. The Lusitanian War is one of the most well documented episodes of the conquest. However Rome’s dominion of Iberia met with much opposition. In 197 BC, Rome divided Iberia into two provinces, Hispania Citerior and Hispania Ulterior, and two elected praetors were assigned to command the legions. Like in many other tribes of Iberia, the inhabitants of the Lusitanian castros, or citanias, would have been granted peregrina stipendiaria.[26][27][28] but remaining an autonomous (Greek: αὐτονόμων) country through treaties (foedus).

Lusitania's rich land was praised by ancient authors. Polybius in his Histories "speaking of the natural wealth of Lusitania [...], tells us that owing to the favorable climate both men and animals are very prolific, and the land is constantly productive."[29]

The Romans charged the native tribes with heavy taxes: a fixed vectigal or land-tax, the tributum and a certain quantity of cereals. [30] Taxes were not the only source of income, mine exploitation and peace treaties were a source of denarius as well as war spoils and war prisoners that were sold as slaves. The indigenous towns had to deliver their own treasures to the Romans, which left them only with the yearly earnings to pay the taxes. Between 209 and 169 BC, the Roman army collected 4 tons of gold and 800 tons of silver looting the native tribes of the Iberian peninsula.[31] The governors extorted as much as they could from the tribes. In 174 BC, when Publius Furius Filo was accused of paying very little for the cereals that Iberia was compelled to deliver to Rome, Cato defended the interests of the native tribes. The exploitation and extortion reached such an extreme degree in the provinces that Rome had to create a special tribunal and laws, like the Lex Calpurnia created in 149 BC. Also as part of the payment, it was required a certain number of men to serve in the Roman army.[32] [33]

[edit] Revolts

The Lusitanians revolted first in 194 BC against the Romans. Iberia was divided between the tribes that supported the Roman rule and the tribes that revolted against the Roman rule, as they had been divided before by those who supported the Carthaginian or the Romans.

This period was marked by a number of broken treaties either by the Roman generals, or their senate, that would not ratify the treaties, or by the native peoples.

In 152 BC the Lusitanians made a peace agreement with Marcus Atilius, after he conquered Oxthracae, Lusitania's biggest city. In the Roman law, peregrini dediticii was the designation given to the peoples who had surrendered themselves after taking up arms against the Romans.[34] The terms offered were such, that as soon as Atilius returned to Rome, they rebelled and broke the treaty. Then they attacked the tribes that were Roman subjects and had sided with the Romans helping to attack and plunder the Lusitanian towns. Possibly the Lusitanians recovered some of the booty the Romans divided with those tribes.

In 151 BC the celtiberians who had become Roman allies, fearing the revenge of the rebels who considered them traitors, asked the Romans to punish the rebellious tribes who had broken out into war and that the legions remained in Iberia to protect them.[35]

[edit] Massacre of the Lusitanians

The praetor to Hispania Ulterior, Servius Sulpicius Galba commanded the Roman troops in Iberia circa 150 BC at the same time Lucius Licinius Lucullus was also appointed Governor of the Hispania Citerior and commander of an army. In the year 151 BC, Lucullus "being greedy of fame and needing money", made a peace treaty with the Caucaei, of the Vaccaei tribe, after which he ordered to kill all the adult males of which, it is said, only a few out of 20,000 escaped.

Servius Sulpicius Galba joined forces with Lucius Licinius Lucullus and together started to depopulate Lusitania. While Lucullus invaded the country from the east, Galba attacked it from the south. Unable to sustain a war in two fronts, the Lusitanian troops suffered several losses in engagements with the Romans. Fearing a long siege and the destruction the Roman siege engines caused in their towns, the Lusitanians sent an embassy to Galba to negotiate a peace treaty, although for the Romans it would be perceived as the Deditio in dicionem , the surrender. The Lusitanians hopped they could at least renew the former treaty made with Atilius. Galba received the Lusitanian embassy politely, and a peace treaty was agreed on the terms proposed by him. He commanded them to leave their homes and remain in an open country. The Lusitanians probably lost their city and possessions and their land would have become Ager Publicus.[36] The con­quest of a territory, unless it had been given special conditions, could imply the acquisition, by the Romans, of the conquered territory and all that it contained.[37]

The treaty turned out to be a trap, like the one Lucculus had prepared for the Caucaei. When the unarmed Lusitanians, among them Viriathus, were gathered together by Galba to hand over their weapons and be split into three groups (two of the points of the treaty that had been negotiated) and allocated to new lands, the trap was sprung. With the promise they would be given new lands they waited unaware while Galba's army surrounded them with a ditch, to prevent them from escaping. Afterwards, Roman soldiers were sent in and began to massacre all the males of military age. The survivors are said to have been sold into slavery in Gaul.

The relocation of an entire tribe, to slaughter or to reduce them to the status of slaves were some of the types of punishment inflicted to the native population who took part in revolts.[38]

Galba distributed a little of the plunder to the army and a little to his friends, the native tribes that sided with him, and kept the rest. This incited a massive rebellion, with the entire Lusitanian tribe mustering as they waged war for 3 years against Rome, but met with many failures.

Three Years after the Massacre, the massive rebellion was nearly at defeat until Viriathus appeared and offered himself as leader. Through understanding of Roman military methods he saved the rebel Lusitanians through a simple, though clever escape plan. Viriathus become the leader of Lusitanians and gave much grief to the Romans as a result of the past massacre of his people.

[edit] The "War of Fire"

v • d • e
Roman conquest of Hispania
Main article: Lusitanian War
“ And, in fine, he carried on the war not for the sake of personal gain or power nor through anger, but for the sake of warlike deeds in themselves; hence he was accounted at once a lover of war and a master of war. ~ Cassius Dio ”

The war with Viriathus was called "War of Fire" by the Greek historian Polybius of Megalopolis. Two types of war were carried on by Viriathus, bellum, when he used a regular army, and latrocinium, when the fighting involved small groups of combatants and the use of guerrilla tactics.[39] For many authors Viriathus is seen as the model of the guerrilla fighter.

Nothing is known about Viriathus until his first feat of war in 149 BC. He was with an army of ten thousand men that invaded southern Turdetania.

Rome sent the praetor Caius Vetilius to fight the rebellion. He attacked a group of Lusitanian warriors who were out foraging, and after killing several of them, the survivals took refuge in a place that was surrounded by the Roman army. They were about to make a new agreement with the Romans when Viriathus, mistrusting the Romans, proposed an escape plan. The Lusitanians inflamed by his speech made him their new commander. His first act was to rescue the currently trapped resisting Lusitanian's whom he took over command of. First by lining up for battle with the Romans, then scattering the army as they charged. As each way broke apart and fled in different directions to meet up at a later location, Viriathus with 1.000 chosen men held the army of 10.000 Romans in check by being in a position to attack, once the rest of the army had fled, he and the thousand men escaped as well.

Having effectively saved all of the Lusitanians immediately fortified the loyalty of the people.

Viriathus organized an attack against Caius Vetilius in Tribola. Since the Romans were better armed, he organized guerrilla tactics and sprung imaginative ambushes. Charging with iron spears, tridents and roars, the Lusitanians defeated Vetilius by killing 4,000 out of 10,000 Troops including Vetilius himself. As a response, the Celtiberians were hired to attack the Lusitanians, but were destroyed. After that incident, the Lusitanians clashed with the armies of Gaius Plautius, Claudius Unimanus and Gaius Negidius, all of whom were defeated. During this period Viriathus inspired and convinced the Numantine and some Gauls to rebel against Roman rule.

To complete the subjugation of Lusitania, Rome sent Quintus Fabius Maximus Aemilianus, with 15,000 soldiers and 2,000 cavalry to strengthen Gaius Laelius Sapiens who was a personal friend of Scipio Aemilianus Africanus.[40] The Romans lost most of these reinforcements in Ossuma. When Quintus Fabius risked combat again, he was totally defeated near what is today the city of Beja in Alentejo. This defeat gave the Lusitanians access to today’s Spanish territory, modern Granada and Murcia. The results of Viriathus's effects as well as that of the Numantine War caused many problems in Rome, including a drop in Legion recruitment rates being the most notable.

Learning of these events, Rome sent one of its best generals, Q. Fabius Maximus Servilianus, to Iberia. Near Sierra Morena, the Romans fell into a Lusitanian ambush. Viriathus did not harm the Romans and let the soldiers and Servilianus go. Servilianus made a peace term that recognized the Lusitanian rule over the land they conquered.

[edit] The treaty

This agreement was ratified by the Roman Senate and Viriathus was declared "amici populi Romani", (Greek: Rhômaiôn philon), an ally of the Roman people. However, the peace brought by the treaty displeased Quintus Servilius Caepio, who got himself appointed successor of his brother, Q. Fabius Maximus Servilianus, in the command of the army and administration of affairs in Iberia. In his reports to the Roman Senate he sustained that the treaty was in the highest degree dishonorable to Rome. Livy seemed to have a different opinion as he said it was a stain in Servilianus' military career but comments that the treaty was, aequis, fair.[15] The senate authorized Q. Servilius Caepio, on his request, to distress Viriathus as long as it was done secretly. The treaty was in effect for one year. During that time Q. Servilius Caepio harassed Viriathus and kept making pressure with his reports until he was authorized to publicly declare war.

[edit] Death

Knowing that the Lusitanian resistance was largely due to Viriathus' leadership, Quintus Servilius Caepio bribed Audax, Ditalcus and Minurus,who had been sent by Viriathus as an embassy to establish peace (Appian[41] Quintus Servilius Caepio was refused his triumph by the senate.

After the death of Viriathus, the Lusitanians kept fighting under the leadership of Tantalus (Greek: Τάνταλος).

Laenas would finally give the Lusitanians the land they originally had asked for before the massacre. Nevertheless total pacification of Lusitania was only achieved under Augustus. Under Roman rule, Lusitania and its people gradually acquired Roman culture and language.

Viriathus stands as the most successful leader in Iberia that ever opposed the Roman conquest. During the course of his campaigns he was only defeated in battle against the Romans once, and from a military standpoint can be said to have been one of the most successful generals to ever have opposed Rome's expansion anywhere in the world. Ultimately even the Romans recognized that it was more prudent to use treachery rather than open confrontation to defeat the Lusitanian uprising. Some fifty years later, the renegade Roman general, Quintus Sertorius, at the head of another insurrection in Iberia, would meet a similar fate.

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Armando Silva, O nome de Viriato.
  2. ^ Douglas Hyde, The Glories of Ireland, Irish Language and Letters.
  3. ^ Celtic Elements in Northwestern Spain in Pre-Roman times.
  4. ^ The greatness and decline of the Celts. Hubert, Henry
  5. ^ Evtropii Breviarivm Liber Qvartvs
  6. ^ Flori Epitome de Tito Livio Bellorum Omnium Annorum DCC, XXXIII.
  7. ^ Marco Quintela, La organización socio-política de los Populi del Noroeste de la Península.
  8. ^ War and Society in the Celtiberian World
  9. ^ Appian, The Foreign Wars, The Wars In Spain, ed. Horace White
  10. ^ Valeri Maximi, Factorum et Dictorum Memorabilium
  11. ^ a b , Cassius Dio, Roman History, Fragments of Books XXII through XXIX.
  12. ^ a b Historical library of Diodorus the Sicilian. p. 543 to p. 620
  13. ^ Britannica Online Encyclopedia.
  14. ^ Celtic Elements in Northwestern Spain in Pre-Roman times.
  15. ^ a b TITI LIVI AB URBE CONDITA LIBER LIV PERIOCHA
  16. ^ The Rhetoric of Gender Terms: 'man', 'woman', and the Portrayal of Character in Latin Prose.
  17. ^ Ciência Hoje
  18. ^ Eric Orlin, Temples, Religion, and Politics in the Roman Republic.
  19. ^ The Dynamic Society: Exploring the Sources of Global Change.
  20. ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, page 85 (v. 2)
  21. ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, page 887 (v. 3)
  22. ^ [1]
  23. ^ SILIVS ITALICVS
  24. ^ España Sagrada
  25. ^ Lusitania: Historia y etnología
  26. ^ Smith, Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities.
  27. ^ Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales.
  28. ^ , John Murray, A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, London, 1875.
  29. ^ Polybius, Histories.
  30. ^ (http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA*/Provincia.html]
  31. ^ Treasures of Portuguese Archaeology.
  32. ^ Raquel López Melero, Viriatus Hispaniae Romulus.
  33. ^ Theodor Mommsen, The History Of Rome, Book IV p.24.
  34. ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. The Ancient Library.
  35. ^ Polybius, Histories. The Celtiberian Wars, Book 35.
  36. ^ Seyffert, Dictionary of Classical Antiquities.
  37. ^ Smith, Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, p. 40.
  38. ^ El Poblamiento Turdetano en el Bajo Guadalquivir, Publicación y difusión electrónica Universidade de Sevilla
  39. ^ Thomas Grunewald, Bandits in the roman army. Guerrilla leaders as latrones.
  40. ^ The book of versions. On friendship.
  41. ^ [2]). These ambassadors returned to their camp and killed Viriathus while he was sleeping. Eutropius, claims that when Viriathus’ assassins asked Q. Servilius Caepio for their payment he answered that "it was never pleasing to the Romans, that a general should be killed by his own soldiers." <ref>[http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/eutropius/text4.html Eutropius, ''Abridgement of Roman History'', Book IV.]</li></ol></ref>

[edit] References

[edit] See also