Talk:Virtual Woman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This entry refutes all the accusations of this software being sexist, which I think the majority would agree that it is. This is NOT NPOV. Written by someone in the company perhaps?
[edit] Advertising?
It seems like this page is specific to one product. Shouldn't this be more of a discussion of virtual people in general?
Quite frankly, I'm surprised someone hasn't created a true "virtual person" yet, aka Simone. The tech is there... maybe no one thinks it will sell? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.228.183 (talk) 02:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think making such a product would probably be a lot more complicated than it sounds. As for an article on virtual persons, if you have enough material on them you should start it, I didn't see one on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.82.9.79 (talk) 06:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyvio?
The image used says that it is copyrighted in the label. Wouldn't that make it ineligible for use here? Sperril (talk) 21:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- The software is copyrighted, not the screen shot, check out the licensing tag. It's a promotional image used under the fair use provision. 71.176.231.129 (talk) 11:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
