Talk:Virtual Villagers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
This article has an archived VG peer review that may contain ideas for improvement.

What should a player do with bones?

Contents

[edit] VV3

Ok this part sounds dumb:

According to the official website of the game, there will be a 3rd chapter. It will be unnamed until the creator of the game finds the chapter's name.

The last sentance is an unofficial claim, and the game is PROBABLY still in the works. I'm changing this.

And to anwser the question above: when you can get a graveyard, click on the bones. Also, Wikipedia is not a help line for the games; just to provide info about them. Also: click the + sign to add a new comment, don't go to edit this page. AND SIGN YOUR POSTS! four Tildes. ~. That's a tilde. Bryse 06:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:VG Assessment

  • Lead section too short per WP:LS.
  • Paragraphs are too short throughout the whole article. Include more sentences in a single paragraph.
  • Some sections are too short to be their own section. Either delete the sections and incorporate the information in the lead, or expand them to two full paragraphs at least.
  • Puzzles and real time belong under gameplay, the section headers can simply be removed.
  • The chapters section leaves three crucial questions unanswered: what is a chapter, how does a game released in chapters work and in what way is that different from a sequel or expansion pack?
  • There are no citations or references in the article. This is required per WP:ATT, WP:OR, WP:V and WP:RS (policy madness - choose your own!). Especially the section on awards needs citations - for proof, simply.
  • There is no "Reception" section. Make one that discusses the previews and reviews of the game.
  • I think the "casualgameguides.com" link does not fit WP:EL and should be removed.

Rated Stub-class, Low importance. --User:Krator (t c) 15:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

  • There is no "Reception" section. Make one that discusses the previews and reviews of the game.

There IS no pre/reviews.

  • The chapters section leaves three crucial questions unanswered: what is a chapter, how does a game released in chapters work and in what way is that different from a sequel or expansion pack?

Strategy guide material.There is only a sequel...24.32.85.95 10:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Websites for citations (temporary section)

I'm dumping external links to useful sites here to avoid spamming the external links of the article further (and move the ones from there too). Once the citations have been made/potential cites have been discounted, I'll remove this section. Links:

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Virtual Villagers Episode 1 Retail Cover.jpg

Image:Virtual Villagers Episode 1 Retail Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)