User talk:Vinodh.vinodh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Recca Hanabishi article
Hi! Please do not restore the Recca Hanabishi article just because you believe that it is "good" to have individual character articles and just because other characters from other series have their own articles; the Recca Hanabishi article is is in violation of WP:NOTE, which is a guideline that states: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Unless you can find reliable secondary sources to support the character's notability, he can't have his own article. Thanks. :) --SilentAria talk 22:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
What Kind of Stuff, do you need to maintain the Individual Articles for the Charecters of the FOR and to the prove the notability of the articles. I'll try to add some Vinodh.vinodh (talk) 01:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- Essentially you have to prove that each of the characters you want to create an article for is notable on their own, so you'd need things like magazine articles, critic reviews, and such. Honestly these characters aren't notable enough by themselves to have their own articles; I myself tried finding some sources to support their notability, (since I did a LOT of major revisions to the individual articles before I noticed that they violated Wikipedia policy and opted to merge them) but there really aren't any as far as I can tell. This is the problem with most fictional character articles on Wikipedia, so just because there are a number of individual character articles that are similar to this one doesn't make it okay to keep it. --SilentAria talk 07:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Ya. Ok. I understand. Sorry for reverting your move Vinodh.vinodh (talk) 14:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Recca Hanabishi has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 01:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Excuse me, Please refere to the Above Discussion about the Article. I was logged off, so couldn't view the message, So I reverted a merge move, without knowing that. Then only I found a message in my talk page, explaining the reasons for the merge and what has to be done to maintain that article. So I reverted my own move, until something is added according WP:NOTE Please revert your move.
P.S: My Browser Cache is not clearing up. I am getting the old versions of the Pages, even though I am online. This is the source for all the confusions, Not seeing the message, reverting, unreverting Vinodh.vinodh (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Daigunder d.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Daigunder d.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 17:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
Hi, I saw that you left a note for me in my user talk page. I know the person you're talking about. He is from Canada. I often add interwiki links. I know another user, user:Betterusername who also had been updating the interwiki links lately. I sent you an e-mail re these. Hope you received it. --Aadal (talk) 22:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
