Talk:Vincenzo Camporini

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vincenzo Camporini was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: March 22, 2008

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Biography     (Rated B-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal B This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Military work group. Military history WikiProject     (Rated B-Class) This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military aviation task force Military biography task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)

[edit] Unsuccessful GAN

This is a good DYK, but it's not comprehensive enough to be a GA (criteria). There are a lot of short sections, some containing one parastub (a one-sentence paragraph), and there is a lot of quoting, not much of your own prose. The references need to be formatting, {{cite web}} is recommended. A few more would help; have you tried Google News?

Gimme a yell if you'd like me to take another look. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:01, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the note on my talk. You're right that you've used the template however you should try and fill out as many parameters as possible. For instance, at the moment (for refs 1 and 2, anyway) you're only filling out the url and title. You could easily work out publisher and accessdate, just for a start. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 04:10, 23 March 2008 (UTC)