User talk:Vilecremence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of LaruaWA11.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

April 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to :Category:Wikipedia administrators, you will be blocked from editing. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 12:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 12:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Unban my User:LaruaWA11 account; these sock or whatever you call them accounts will continue until it's unbanned so I can use it again. No amount of blocks shall prevent me from creating accounts in order to use this site."

Decline reason: "Threatening to continue socking will not get you an unblock. — MBisanz talk 12:16, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.