Talk:Viktor Korchnoi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chess. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	Chess Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-Importance on the importance scale.
	This article is in the list of Selected articles that are shown on the Portal:Chess.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	Russia Portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the assessment scale.

I've inserted "sometimes" into the assertion that Korchnoi is reckoned to be the best player never to be world champ - plenty of others have been called that (Keres and Rubinstein are the two that come immediately to mind, I'm sure there are more). Also, were Korch and Karpov really "friends" when they played in '74? I thought they'd always been mortal enemies, but I could well be wrong. --Camembert

Malathion 22:31, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) I think it's pretty clear that Anand is the strongest player never to be world champion, although I guess that has yet to be determined. I'm removing this line, as it seems to be too controversial.

Isofarro 17:06, 25 Feb 2005 (GMT) Karpov and Korchnoi had a private training match together before the the 1972/4 candidates cycle (Korchnoi was invited by Karpov/his group). That would suggest they were on good terms at that point (I remember reading about this in a chessbook about Karpov or Korchnoi, but can't remember which one!). Correction: From Anatoly Karpov - Chess is my life p52: "I appeared in my second USSR Championship after winning one of the Semi-Finals in the Latvian town of Daugavpils [1971]. That qualifying tournament had shown that I was clearly superior to the semi-final level, and was no longer a novice grandmaster, but a real, fully-fledged one. In addition, I had behind me a secret training match with Korchnoi. A match, which had ended in a draw, and shown me things were not as difficult as might have been expected."

• Something interesting just cropped up in Korchnoi's "Chess is my Life" autobiography. Karpov and Korchnoi played a secret training match, where Korchnoi had White in one game, and Black in the other five games of the six game match. I wonder if that is the same match as identified above? As far as I can tell both players won a game, with the rest drawn. Korchnoi also informed Karpov of the exact variation he would play, allowing Karpov to study that variation. This was part of a match designed to improve Korchnoi's match playing style. That's an interesting twist. Isofarro 11:31 30 April 2006.

Isofarro 17:06, 25 Feb 2005 (GMT) As far as I can identify, the relationship starting cooling rapidly on the 1974 Candidates final when Karpov was favoured by the Soviet authorities and thus benefitting from better living quarters and his own choice of seconds. (Source: Korchnoi vs Spassky, Chess Crisis, by Raymond Keene, p12) There is also the accusations that Korchnoi received threats from angry chess fans, during that match, when he was close to winning the match - but I saw no evidence to suggest this was linked to Karpov.

I'de say he's quite possibly the strongest non champion, but it's so hard to tell, for it could also be Keres, Rubinstein, Najdorf, Larsen, Short, Reschevsky, Chigorin, Marshall, Schlechter, Tarrasch, Nimzovitch, Reuben Fine, or Flohr. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.226.77.23 (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

---

I know, as the article says, that it is "oft repeated", and I'm not really doubting its veracity, but could we perhaps give a source supporting the "can I castle when my rook is attacked" story? In particular, could we give the source in which Korchnoi himself confirmed the story? --Camembert

• Its mentioned hear. [1] 12.220.47.145 22:25, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Game 21 of the 1974 Candidates Final, Korchnoi won in 19 moves. References [2] and [3] -- Isofarro 17:36 25 Feb 2006
• In Korchnoi's Best Games, volume 1: Games with White, Game 19 is this win against Karpov. The annotation before 18. O-O! "The last trap: ...Nf3+ is threatened, and White must remove his king from the centre. Fortunately, castling when the rook is en prise is permitted..." which is a tantalysing clue, if not a complete reference! Isofarro 17:51 25 Feb 2006

• I'm pretty sure that the GM who got confused about the rules was Averbakh, not Korchnoi [4]. I semi-remember CJS Purdy's "Life and Games" book mentioning the incident, but I'm not sure of that. Phr 16:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• I've just got back from the Chess & Bridge book signing with Victor Korchnoi. I asked him specifically about the annotation above and whether that was the point he asked the match referee on whether he could castle in that position. Korchnoi confirmed that he did ask the match referee whether he could castle - he asked because the chess rules he grew up with were a bit unclear in whether castling was permitted when the rook was being attacked. There was a lot of anxiety around the game itself, so Korchnoi wanted to be sure before making the move - which was 18. O-O. Korchnoi's lecture later went through this game (21st game of Candidates Final, against Karpov), and retold the story, including the detail that the match referee he approached was Salo Flohr. Essentially, he'd never played in a position where this situation occurred before. Isofarro 16:00 29 April 2006
• My notes of the lecture are here: http://www.chessvault.com/2006/04/29/victor-korchnoi-at-the-chess-bridge/ Isofarro 11:26 30 April 2006

Karpov said his relationship with Korchnoi depended of Viktor's mood.

From the article: However, it later came out that the Merano match was actually pre-arranged by the KGB. Korchnoi himself admitted this in an interview with the chess magazine "Inside Chess".

a reference for this statement please??? It sounds like a rumour at best..

Contents 1 Layout 2 Wife? 3 Bias 4 Importance 5 defection - soviet gradnmasters condemning it

[edit] Layout

This article needs some help with sections and layout, rather than just being one big block of text. 64.38.194.13 17:16, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wife?

Did his wife ever leave the Soviet Union? The article only talks about his son. AxelBoldt 00:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bias

Korchnoi took the opportunity of the match to publicize the situation of his wife and son, drafting an open letter to the Soviet government to release them both. This continuing effort likely led to his dismal performance as Karpov swept to victory in what was dubbed the "Massacre in Merano".

likely?

Good point. I've removed the linkage between the two events. Rocksong 04:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Importance

I believe that the Korchnoi piece deserves "Top" importance rather than "High" on wiki's scale for chess. Bronstein and Keres also deserve "Top" importance, rather than "High", in my view, based on their achievements and status. And Portisch (which I am adding to) deserves to be boosted from "Mid" to "High", since Portisch was a top player for a very long period, with many impressive achievements.

Frank Dixon 14:02 (GMT +5), 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Nah, 'High' is about right for Korchnoi. He's no Capablanca or Kasparov. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.210.51.222 (talk) 05:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] defection - soviet gradnmasters condemning it

There is no mention of the open letter from a number of proeminent soviet grandmasters (except bronstein, spassky and botvinnik, who refused to sign it - see David Bronstein) that condemned korchnoi for defecting. I think this is something interesting for the "defection" section, but sources needs to be found. 195.207.160.202 (talk) 14:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

• I agree. This would be a good thing to cover in the article. Quale (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow. he switched over to play for the swiss... he's cool. this shame should definitely be mentioned in his history.