Talk:Viking Youth Power Hour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's knowledge of notable podcasts, and podcast-related information. If you would like to participate, don't hesitate to join!

Unassessed This article has been rated as Unassessed-Class on the assessment scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Viking Youth Power Hour article.

Article policies

As an aficionado of talk radio for many of my formative years I believe in the content that these brave new world entrepreneurs are giving to the radio community.

Not only are the shows informative they touch the soul with heart felt moments of gut busting laughter….the likes that Lenny Bruce would deeply appreciate.

Topics run the gamut from the paranormal to riveting debates on Aqua Man’s sexuality. The shows offer a myriad of captivating guests like Alex and Alyson Grey, that the audience can only benefit from by expanding their horizons.

My final note is a plea to urge those responsible at Wikipedia for deletion to not delete this page from its database; I think it would be a great loss.

Valhalla!

70.91.125.241 M* a fervent Detroit Fan of The Viking Youth Power Hour


So is the editor that felt compelled to post the 'disputed neutrality' and other tags at the top of the page not going to elucidate on what their problem is with the page? I don't know how wiki users are supposed to fix whatever it is this person has a problem with unless they take the time to make it clear here. If you can take the time to tag up the page I would imagine you could take the time to post what the impetus was for your gripe so it can be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.90.64 (talk • contribs) 15:36, October 23, 2006 (UTC)

  • Sure...--Isotope23 16:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neutrality

Statements in an article need to be sourced, particularly if they promote a certain point of view. Right now this article isn't exactly neutral because it makes claims that are biased towards the show and not attributed to any source. You cannot just say "program X is a really innovative and progressive show" for example. You have to be able to attribute a statement of that sort to a reliable source and it should be written: "program X has been referred to as an innovative and progressive show by

Invalid language.

You need to specify a language like this: <source lang="html">...</source>

Supported languages for syntax highlighting:

actionscript, ada, apache, applescript, asm, asp, autoit, bash, blitzbasic, bnf, c, c_mac, caddcl, cadlisp, cfdg, cfm, cpp, cpp-qt, csharp, css, d, delphi, diff, div, dos, eiffel, fortran, freebasic, gml, groovy, html4strict, idl, ini, inno, io, java, java5, javascript, latex, lisp, lua, matlab, mirc, mpasm, mysql, nsis, objc, ocaml, ocaml-brief, oobas, oracle8, pascal, perl, php, php-brief, plsql, python, qbasic, rails, reg, robots, ruby, sas, scheme, sdlbasic, smalltalk, smarty, sql, tcl, text, thinbasic, tsql, vb, vbnet, vhdl, visualfoxpro, winbatch, xml, xpp, z80