User talk:Vijaykrishna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

There is an Wikipedia:Notice board for India-related topics. I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk to me

Contents

[edit] Articles

Hello, just to let you know, you do not need to sign on articles. The articles themselves should be unattributed. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a line. --Mitsukai 03:37, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

  • When you'd made that last entry, you used the attribution settings in the article: -- followed by four ~ . It's not a big issue, and I made the mistake the first time myself. Just thought I'd point it out in case it was a mistake. If not, no biggie. --Mitsukai 03:48, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Virender Sehwag picture

Hello Vijay,

Thank you for finding a picture of Virender Sehwag, but unfortunately I've had to list it at Wikipedia:Copyright problems#August 23. We can't legally use images taken from other sites without permission. Sad, but that's the law.

Stephen Turner 13:09, 23 August 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Rajput

Wikipedia admins, Gothean and other muslim users have hijacked wikipedia. Here is an example . A muslim user Raja asserted that I have some kind of faith insecurity. I let this sit on wiki for a few days. This self appointed moderator Goethean was on snooze. In the interim some user called me a moron also. Still Goethean was on snooze.

Then after two days I replied to Raja with my side and Goethean deleted my response to raja's assertion.

How is the censorship legal? Please block Gothean from rajput website because he is biased.

-Shivraj

Line 453: Line 453:

- I pity one thing here. That you're insecurity for a faith you know next to nothing about (other than through Hindutva propoganda) is causing you to even harass a page dedicated to our ancestors. --Raja 13:30, 24 October 2005 (UTC) --Raja 13:30, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Line 462: Line 461:

::::Raja your answer to my question was Again why should we? Who cares? Is this an answer? Go back to my questions and justify why your group should be allowed to edit wiki just based on beliefs. I am being very polite and nice here. ::::Raja your answer to my question was Again why should we? Who cares? Is this an answer? Go back to my questions and justify why your group should be allowed to edit wiki just based on beliefs. I am being very polite and nice here. - - :::::I pity one thing here. That you're insecurity for a faith you know next to nothing about (other than through Hindutva propoganda) is causing you to even harass a page dedicated to our ancestors. - - ::::Above assertion from raja is what I have responded to below. Is this a marriage of vandals where muslim side is allowed to stick its posts and when we respond you delete it. - - ::::Since you brought issue of religion why is it that the most exalted muslim country in the world, Saudi Arabia, does not allow other religions to build there temples of worship? As I have said before it is your religious leaders and your religion who is afraid to see other religions practiced in there domain even in this modern age. Who are you trying to fool here? This is no madarsa that you can brainwash somebody into beleiving your doctrines.

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Template/Workshop

You, or any Wikipedia user, can contribute your suggestions and comments to the /Workshop page of any active arbitration case. Comments on evidence or proposals can help in understanding the import of evidence and in refining proposals. Proposed principles, findings of fact, or remedies may be listed on /Proposed decision and form part of the final decision. Fred Bauder 19:39, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Regarding Association of Members' Advocates

Hi, you are recieving this message because you have listed yourself as an active member of WP:AMA. If you aren't currently accepting inquiries for AMA, please de-list yourself from Wikipedia:AMA Advocates accepting inquiries, and consider noting it on the main list of members on WP:AMA. If you are, please consider tending to any new requests that may appear on Wikipedia:AMA_Requests_for_Assistance. We're going to put AMA on wheels. :) (please direct any responses to my talk page) --Phroziac . o º O (♥♥♥♥ chocolate!) 22:56, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] AMA

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AMA Coordinator Election

Dear AMA Member,

You are entitled to vote in the AMA Coordinator election, set to begin at midnight on 3 February 2006. Please see the pages on the election and its candidates and the procedure and policy and cast a vote by e-mail!

Wally 11:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Are birds not allowed on Wikipedia?

I added a couple of external links about Kashmir since there is more to Kashmir than just Indo-Pak politics. One is about the birds of Kashmir and another is a photogallery. However the links were deleted by a certain ElC [1]. I have added them again but maybe I am missing something here? Even links I had added a few months earlier were deleted but i dont know by whom. Are birds/animals/photos not allowed or what?

[edit] AMA

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome.Gator (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Advocate Team Re: RfC Woggly

I am presently coordinating a team of advocates re: my RfC for harassment by user:woggly. I welcome you to be a member. Simply read the RFC lodged against me by user:woggly and the RFC which I have filed against her. It's really simple stuff when all of her harassment and my (and others) various attempts to resolve any issues are in black and white. Please also view the talks pages where Woggly admits to harassment and infers that she will not cease. Thank you for your consideration. Best wishes, IsraelBeach 19:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] REQUEST MODERATION

Can you please moderate the "Buddhism and Science" page, as there is a user "science apologist" who keeps undoing quotes and references. He is continually claiming that "there is no evidence" of there being any influence, when I have put forward many quotes and references...I don't mind saying "the influence is disputed -- but to say "there is NO evidence" is clearly biased. --Sangha 15:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thebigfight.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thebigfight.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 11:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)