Talk:ViewSonic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Business and economics Portal This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Stub	rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

	Companies Portal This article is within the scope of Companies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of companies. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating assessment scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ViewSonic article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion April 11th to April 19th 2004. Discussion:

• advert, not exactly neutral either ping 08:42, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Bad grammar, bad spelling, POV, ad. Four strikes against it. RickK 08:53, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. -Plop 14:50, Apr 11, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete Bensaccount 15:23, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Advert, no reason given that it will ever become an article. Andrewa 17:14, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Nonsense, Andrew. ViewSonic is a well-known company; we have articles about all manner of different companies and this is no different. Definitely keep. Darkcore 21:19, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Now an acceptable stub. Good work. Andrewa 07:04, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• If this is a real company, keep Ensiform 04:41, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Revised entry is appropriate. Cribcage 06:51, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • agreed, keep the new version ping 08:00, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• This is a real company. New version seems fine; keep. —Psychonaut 15:41, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Large well-known company. -- Zigger 17:57, 2004 Apr 16 (UTC)
• Keep. 3m hits can't be wrong. BL 07:38, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. Scurra 16:46, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Forbes article in Reference section of ViewSonic page should be changed

The reference section links to an outdated article on Forbes.com. The Associated Press has since issued a correction. The corrected version can be found here: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/07/02/ap3879649.html

This version CORRECTS that company earned $3.97 million in latest quarter instead of losing about $4 million. 12.33.144.99 17:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

---

Research needs to be done on these monitors and made public. I've been through 2 Viewsonics, 17" in one year. The power connection failed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.208.181 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 15 July 2007