Talk:Vienna Dioscurides

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

	Middle Ages Portal Vienna Dioscurides is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
WikiProject Middle Ages To do:

The History of this article is false and misleading: it makes it look as if I rewrote the article, when in fact all I did was fix the Category (a minor edit). This was my first and only edit to this article, 1:51 26 March (earlier today). The earlier article was much better and I wouldn't have rewritten it at all. See my History of Contributions which proves what I'm saying. Alexander 007 03:45, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Looking at the history, you somehow ended up editing the first revision of the article, the only version in which the category was broken. I offer no explanation as to how this happened. -- Cyrius|✎ 04:34, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

When I first discovered the article (just before my first edit to it), the article that was displayed was that old version. I saw the broken category, and I fixed it. Some one must have reverted it to that old version before I came upon it. Alexander 007 05:00, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I still have no explanation for this, and have never heard of it happening. If it was reverted, it should have shown up in the edit history. -- Cyrius|✎ 15:38, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Strange things happen in my presence. Alexander 007 06:49, 27 November 2005 (UTC)