Talk:Videoscandals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
Hi!
Need some more substance on this article.
First there's no description of the Niño Verde (Emilio González Martínez) video, which was the first one shown, just a brief reference to it. Could add that it received an award on Mtv, which of course he didn't personally receive...
Also need to add Carlos Imaz to the list of illustrious filmed politicians!
- Let's focus on NPOV Hari Seldon 21:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 2006 videoscandals
Hseldon: Are you honestly claiming that the meaning of a "self-attempt" (not an English word, which is why I'm trying to not just directly translate it, but explain it) is not that the person in question him/herself staged the attack? Because that's how I read the word, and that leaves the suspects being Ahumada's wife, her children, or her driver, and I doubt the children or the driver are behind it. JZ 20:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that there is some evidence that the attempted murder could have been staged. However, data is not yet clear enough. Was it done by Ahumada's wife, or by Ahumada himself? Some of the news talk that the attempt was targeting the driver, so, what's the truth here? I don't know... And honestly, if we don't know, or the truth is unclear, we should have the article reflect that.
- I am not saying that Ahumada's wife couldn't have staged the attempt, I'm saying that we don't know for sure it was her.
- Hari Seldon 22:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Videoscandal2004.jpg
Image:Videoscandal2004.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
