User talk:Vic226
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives |
1 |
Contents |
[edit] I did not attack anyone in that last thing you left on my talk page
No you are mistaken. I did not attack anyone. I did not attack you or other editors. So stop lying. You attacked me by accusing me of attacking others. This is an unfounded and ridiculous lie. I am hurt by this constant lying that you keep doing to me. PLease stop and assume good faith. TingMing 17:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm kind of too tired to bring up another truckload of diff links of you making attacks on others in your edit history. And your repetitive "please assume good faith" format is getting boring. Vic226說 00:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Taiwan Province
About the link to the PRC government site, I have moved the link to the PRC Taiwan Province page where it belongs. I agree that the link does not belong on the ROC Taiwan Province page. Thanks. Ngchen 12:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I did not attack anyone
Stop lying by saying that I attacked John Smith. After what you said last time I made it clear that I am not using a deragatory term. I purposely used Britton. That is the way the British are called. You said Brit was bad, so I used Britton. Now what do you think you are doing to attack me so randomly like that? I did nothing wrong. Please, Vic, I have been already hurt numerous times by your rash actions. Can you just please stop, calm down, and think it over before you attack me so violently again? I am constantly hurt by you. Please stop harrasing me and stop hurting me mentally and emotionally. That would be a great help. thank you :9 TingMing 04:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- So you "purposely" ignored my note below the warning. You appear to have trouble thinking how the others might feel about what you said to them. Again (OMG Why am I saying so much same things over and over again to you), what you think about your actions does NOT count; what others feel DOES count. You really need to learn how to interact with others in a friendly way, which you do not seem to know about. Plus, why should I feel bad about you getting emotionally hurt when you yourself are ruthlessly assaulting everyone who does not agree with you? That is how I see you in your interaction with us. And please don't copy others' quotation ("... stop, calm down, and think it over before...") for retorting everyone on sight; that isn't creative and sometimes irritating. Vic226說 00:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- I did not copy anyone. I thought of it myself. Look, please stop attacking me. I already told you to stop. I told you specifically that I used Briton. There is nothing wrong with that. John Smith didn't even say anything about it. He is PRODUD to be BRITISH like on his talk page. It is you who keeps making up these accusations to hurt me even more. This happened last time too..Last time he didnt say anything as well. You have been the sole attacker and agressor. Please STOP it! You hurt me too much. TingMing 06:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Ting, you removed a barnstar from my page which you had no right to do. That shows bad faith, so I think you probably were trying to attack me in the case being discussed here. Just because I am proud to be British doesn't mean you think there's anything to be proud about (being British). John Smith's 06:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- The barn star is another matter. This is talking about Britton. What is so bad about that? TingMing 07:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Ting, your attitude towards other users leaves much to be desired. I realize that from your position it's tempting to interpret everything from the perspective of partisan politics. Wikipedia doesn't work that way, which is why you've met so much opposition from other editors... in this incarnation, and others. Let's leave it at that. If you have further issues you can discuss them on my talk page or the relevant article talk page. -Loren 08:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- I personally realize that there is a large group of people who are ganging up against me in such a way that it is despicable and terrible. For instance, someone leaves something on my talk page for no apparent reason as a threat. You even left (Loren) a comment on the page he created for Sockpuppets. Did you see what he reverted against me? That is wrong and unreasonable. Taipei is the provisional capital of the ROC. theres nothing wrong with that. I keep getting hurt, Loren36 please tell that person to stop. thanks. i love you .TingMing 00:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cabal, anyone? I love you too, Ting - I always look forward to your posts. :) --Folic Acid 00:37, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
TingMing, along with anyone else, please stop spamming my talk page like it's a battlefield. Further comments under this title will be deleted. Thanks, Vic226說 05:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
(Award moved to User page)
- Thanks for the award! Although I should admit that I did not exactly keep a cool head at some occasions in the recent complication, I still appreciate your recognition of my effort. Vic226說 01:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:ROC2
Template:ROC2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — John Smith's 23:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WHS
Haha, you should have given him a higher warning, he obviously spent a lot of effort on that! Joshdboz 12:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spreading some Wikilove :D
Nat Tang talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
[edit] Teen Titans (video game)
A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Teen Titans (video game), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. B. Wolterding 11:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:CVU status
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] npov warning
I didn't make those edits--I was eating dinner at the time and my computer was idle and in a room in my home that nobody was in. 72.66.218.145 (talk) 00:44, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but this edit was done in March—last year. How did you remember something as trivial as having dinner that happened about 10 months ago? And unless you can even remotely provide any evidence that you did not do it, you should know that Wikipedia logs unregistered users' IP addresses upon their editing the articles for safety reasons. In the end, I'm afraid I cannot buy your explanation and shall remind you that you're responsible for any action taken place under your own IP address, either you did it or not. Vic226說 03:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)