Talk:Victor/Victoria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Victor/Victoria article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Victor/Victoria is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start Class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.

Contents

[edit] See the Film

"female singer...takes a job as a man masquerading as a woman" -- how can a woman be as a man who masquerades as a woman? W-M-W? I don't see the logic. --Menchi (Talk)â 10:19, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)


You expect logic? It's a film! She pretends to be a man, and then goes on stage pretending to be a woman. So the audience (within the film) think it's a man in drag. I've tried to make it a little clearer -- Tarquin 10:52, 14 Dec 2003 (UTC)

[edit] POV

I'm not going to edit anything, both for being tired and having not seen the movie or play, but it seems to me comments regarding which song is the 'most beautiful number' isn't very factual, encyclopedia-like information.

Bwahahaha. I was just going to add the same comment :) --Ecksemmess (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:48536.1010.A.jpg

Image:48536.1010.A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Official title

I do not want to move the article and make a mess so I will just comment here that IMDB says that the 1982 version of the film is called Victor Victoria without the sign /. Does anybody want to move it? --FedericoMP (talk) 07:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)