Talk:Victor Drazen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Merger
The article should be merged character on in season one, may have been portrayed by a known celebrity. The character is deceased and not talked about after season one The notability if there is any is not asserted. Merge --Lucy-marie 17:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
A very minor character without that much airtime. Not notable outside of season 1 and no importance in the wider 24 universe. The page is a plot summary and there is no discussion of the character himself. Merge. asyndeton 14:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Why don't we merge Andre, Alexis, and Victor into one page, instead of putting them in the minor character page.
They are minor characters from the same family there can be a sub section on the minor characters page if you like.--Lucy-marie 10:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
A sub section sounds decent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.4.138.188 (talk) 04:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
He's the big villain of the season, not some minor henchman.--Gonzalo84 22:27, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, but being the 'big villain' of a season does not immediately establish notability. asyndeton talk 00:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Further, the assassination attempt on him prior to the start of the show did result in Stephen Saunders desicion to "clean up America." 24.24.90.148 02:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
What was his impact in sesons 2 3 4 5 and 6 absolutly nil his only season was one and he appeared in a maximum of 10 of 144 episodes not really notable in the big picture merge to commence.--Lucy-marie 09:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Lucy, don't keep doing these merges unilaterally. He was a major character involed not only on TV, but the book 24:Nightfall. He was important to season 1 and was connected to season 3 indirectly.Lan Di (talk) 22:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:VictorDrazen2.jpg
Image:VictorDrazen2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)