Talk:Victor Celorio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Mexico Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 December 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

[edit] Neutrality

The article has been nominated twice for deletion and for good reasons. The persons who have created the article and mostly contributed to it seem to have interest in no other articles than promoting this particular subject. See the edit list of Don verchon, Llambert, BadBull - they seem to be sock puppets. → Aethralis 00:08, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually the second time was a formality on reversing the deletion, not a second nomination for deletion. Those editors do seem to all have the same interest, but different enough styles that they're unlikely to be sockpuppets. Dicklyon 05:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral

I'm trying to make all rigth on the article but it indicated that needs more links to this article , then I add links on other pages in wich all I wrote only indicates the aportation to the subject and links to Victor Celorio. The article was nominated to deletion because it needed sources of the information , when it was fixed , the votes change to Keep. If you are nominating for deletion because I only work in this article , and the votes of Don Verchon and Lambert , it is not the article wich it's wrong , the article fulfill the guide lines of the wikipedia.--BadBull 19:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

You don't have to do it all yourself. You can leave the editorial tags like "orphan" and wait and see if anyone else finds a good reason to link to it. Nobody is recommending deletion at this point, so don't let those tags bother you. Dicklyon 05:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral

What matters is the objectivity of the content, not how many articles the editors have written. This argument is not only silly: it runs contrary to the spirit and purpose of Wikipedia which is written and corrected freely by volunteers, not by self-appointed police of other people's intentions. Show me where is my article not objective, and I will correct it.

Actually, wikipedia is run by self-appointed police of other people's intentions, and one way to get a feeling for people's intentions is to look at their editing history. Live with it. Dicklyon 19:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)