Talk:Vibrio cholerae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Microbiology WikiProject Vibrio cholerae is part of WikiProject Microbiology, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of microbiology and microbiology-related topics. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Top This article is on a subject of top-importance within microbiology.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Pacini and Koch

Looking up on cholera in my encyclopedia set, I found a little bit on the bacteria Vibrio comma. I believe this was possibly an older name for Vibrio cholerae? Nonetheless, the text reads that

Vibrio comma was first dicovered in 1883 by the German physician and Bacteriologist Robert Koch.

The encyclopedia in question is the Funk and Wagnalls New Encyclopedia, Volume 6, pages 79-80. The copyright year is 1979. CanbekEsen 05:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Background on V. Cholerae

The discovery of Vibrio Cholerae was made by Pacini in 1854, who found curved bacteria in intestinal contents of cholera victims. However, Robert Koch, who studied cholera in Egypt during 1883, demonstrated that the cholerae disease was caused by a comma-shaped organism, which he named Kommabazillen. This work by Koch initially gained alot of attention and overshadowed the work of Pacini. For several decades, the name Vibrio Comma was also used. Finally, the pioneering work of Pacini was recognized and the name was changed back to Vibrio Cholerae.

Read more in: J.B. KAPER, J.G. MORRIS, JR., AND M.M. LEVINE, Cholera, CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, Jan. 1995, p. 48–86

85.224.21.147 (talk) 22:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Dabalk

[edit] Virus?

Is it true that this bacteria was attacked by a virus making it extremely dangerous? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.172.157 (talk) 11:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)