Talk:Velagapudi Ramakrishna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
More information about this article... ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
More information about this article... The following comments have been left for this page: This is quite a comprehensive article about a personality, who doesn't have much mention of his works, in his lifetime. --AltruismTo talk 05:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC) (edit)

[edit] Copyedit

This article, or a portion of it, was copyedited by the League of Copyeditors in April 2007. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Copyeditor(s): Cricketgirl 20:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Decent article

The article may not be of sufficient length and volume, but definitely serves its purpose of a whole hearted biography. Almost all available information about the person in question, have been added.

You are welcome to add any facts, that may have been missed out or overlooked. Please also cite credible sources, corresponding to the facts added. Thanking You, Altruism^{To talk} 05:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reason for the tags

Why do the users who added some tags, think:

1) That the article's neutrality is disputed?

2) That the article needs considerable copyediting, or corrections in the presentation?

If you feel so, then please help.

Thanking You, Altruism^{To talk} 05:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't think that it's disputed, I'm disputing it (and a glance at the content should surely explain why); removing "highly" from "highly commendable" doesn't make it less PoV (and turning the decent, clear English "came from" into the odd and journalistic "hailed from" doesn't improve the style). The article as it stands is a mess from beginning to end; I'll work on it if and when I can, unless someone with a good grasp of English gets to it before me. In the meantime, please don't remove the tags without doing the required work. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

The required copy-editing has been done. Minor errors (if at all) remaining could please be corrected. Since, the tag "Copy edit required" isn't warranted anymore, its being discarded with immediate effect. All my actions are well-meaning and assuming good faith--Altruism^{To talk} 06:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)