Variations in first-class cricket statistics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article seeks to explain the key differences in alternative versions of English first-class cricket statistics.

The concept of first-class cricket originated in May 1894 at a meeting of the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) committee and the secretaries of the clubs involved in the official County Championship, which had begun in 1890. As a result, those clubs became first-class from 1895 along with MCC, Cambridge University, Oxford University, major cricket touring teams and other teams designated as such by MCC.

First-class cricket was formally defined by the then Imperial Cricket Conference (ICC) in May 1947 as a match of three or more days duration between two sides of eleven players officially adjudged first-class; the governing body in each country to decide the status of teams.

Significantly, it was stated that the definition does not have retrospective effect.

The absence of any ruling about matches played before 1947 (or before 1895 in Great Britain) has caused problems for cricket historians and especially statisticians. Matches that meet the official definitions, assuming they featured teams of the necessary high standard, have been recorded since 1697. It was inevitable that historians and statisticians would seek to apply first-class status retrospectively, in contravention of the ICC and MCC directives.

The position is that each statistician must compile his own list based on his personal opinions. As a result, significant differences may be observed in published statistical records with particular impact on the career records of W G Grace, Jack Hobbs and Herbert Sutcliffe. At club level, there are differences in the perceived status of certain matches played by Gloucestershire CCC before 1870 and by Somerset CCC in 1879 and 1881. However, it should be noted that the number of differences is relatively small in terms of the sport's overall statistics.

One of the problems is that statisticians have tended not to publish their match lists with their findings.

In the context of pre-definition matches, first-class cricket is essentially a statistical concept and not a historical one. Historians record the importance of a match in contemporary terms regardless of 21st century ideas. Thus, to a cricket historian, the inter-county match between Kent and Surrey in 1709 has the same importance as the County Championship match between the same two counties in 2007. In short, both are major cricket matches and both presumably met the requirements of the first-class match definition.

Contents

[edit] Development of scoring to 1895

The problem of different versions is as old as cricket scorecards themselves. The earliest known scorecards are dated 1744 but very few were created (or have survived) between 1744 and 1772 when they became habitual.

The main source for scorecards since 1772 until the 1860s is Arthur Haygarth’s Scores & Biographies, which was published in several volumes. Haygarth used a number of sources for his scorecards including many that were created by the Hambledon Club and MCC. He frequently refers to earlier compilers such as Samuel Britcher, W Epps [1] and Henry Bentley [2]. Haygarth often mentions in his match summaries that another version exists of the scorecard he has reproduced. Sometimes he outlines the differences which range from players' names to runs scored and even to apparent discrepancies in innings totals or match results.

Haygarth first mentions the difficulty of obtaining scorecards in his summary of the Hampshire v Surrey match at Broadhalfpenny Down on 26 August 1773:

"The Score of this match was obtained from the Hampshire Chronicle, and it was not inserted in the old printed book of Hambledon Scores from 1772 to 1784".

Then, in his summary of the Surrey v Hampshire match at Laleham Burway on 6-8 July 1775:

"The above is taken from the old printed score books; but in another account, in the first innings of Surrey, Miller is b Brett...&c".

He goes on to list a total of 13 differences between his two versions, some re dismissal details and others re scores. He then makes a highly pertinent comment:

"It may here be remarked, that when there are two scores of the same match, they never agree". (The italics are Haygarth's own)

In saying that, Haygarth has recognised the essence of the problem when there is no standard means of scoring and no centralised control over the system of capturing and storing the data.

Scoring systems in the 18th century had nothing like the consistency of standard that was employed through the 20th century to the present. Many early cards gave no details of dismissal. Where dismissal was recorded, it was limited to the primary mode and so a fielder would be credited with a catch but the bowler would not be credited with the wicket unless he bowled out the batsman.

Scorecards became more detailed through the 19th century but reliability remained a problem and different versions continued to appear. A greater problem surfaced after 1890 with the establishment of the County Championship because, as described above, this gave rise in 1895 to the concept of first-class cricket and so, for the first time, there was a perceived higher standard based on organisation of games in an official competition. Until then, everything had been somewhat ad hoc and playing standards was a term applied very liberally, especially with teams containing guest or occasional players in addition to recognised players.

The first-class career of W G Grace began in 1865 and continued through a record-equalling 44 seasons to 1908. There is general agreement about the status of his matches after the 1890 watershed but a measure of disagreement about the status of some of his earlier games.

[edit] Statistical records

Grace's "original" career totals were compiled by F S Ashley-Cooper and added to his obituary in the 1916 Wisden. The first statistician to make a significant challenge to these "accepted figures" was Roy Webber.

Webber published the Playfair Book of Cricket Records in 1951 and this deferred to the Wisden version re Grace. In his introduction, Webber expressed the view that first-class records should commence in 1864 and a number of sources have agreed with this date. It is true that none of the cricketers with large career totals played before 1864 and so using this startpoint is not really an issue in that context. It does affect other cricket records: e.g., the lowest known team score occurred in the 1810 match between England and The Bs (with Wells and Lawrell) when The Bs were dismissed for 6 in their second innings, and that match is not regarded as first-class by those statisticians who still use 1864 as their statistical startpoint. The main significance of 1864 was the legalisation of overarm bowling but there is also evidence of a more structured approach to inter-county cricket which ultimately brought about the introduction of the official County Championship. 1864 was also the first year in which the Wisden Almanack was published, so it is therefore easier to get scores and results fromt his point onwards.

During the 1950s, Webber made a detailed study of Grace's career and in the February 1961 edition of Playfair Cricket Monthly, he presented his own revised figures by excluding matches he did not regard as first-class.

In his later record books (e.g., The Book of Cricket Records, concise edition, 1963), Webber quoted both versions, referring to the Wisden totals as the "accepted figures" and his own as the "corrected figures". But Webber excluded Grace's 1873 double to indicate that he preferred the "corrected figures".

The same approach was used by Bill Frindall in his Kaye Book of Cricket Records published in 1968.

Webber's "corrected figures" are based on a different matchlist to that subsequently created by the Association of Cricket Statisticians (ACS) in the 1970s. The differences here are that Webber includes the Gloucestershire match of 1868 but excludes two England v XIII of Kent matches played in 1878 and 1879. He excludes all five Gloucestershire v Somerset matches between 1882 and 1885 (see below).

Soon after the ACS was founded in 1973, Rowland Bowen using its journal was among the first to raise doubts [3] [4] that there could ever be a generally acknowledged list of first-class matches.

In 1976, the ACS produced a booklet, A Guide to First-class Cricket Matches played in the British Isles, outlining its view of the first-class matches played from 1864 to 1946. This was followed by booklets covering other countries and, in 1981, A Guide to Important Cricket Matches played in the British Isles 1709-1863. From 1996, the ACS produced a further series of booklets giving complete scorecards of first-class matches from 1801.

The ACS has given [5] a number of reasons for taking its startpoint back from 1864 to 1801, among them the view that standards of play during the roundarm era were as high as in the overarm era. In the meantime, Bill Frindall had produced his Wisden Book of Cricket Records and, as he explained in his preface, he used 1815 as the starting point for "proper" first-class cricket, though he conceded that there is a reasonable case for several other years, particularly Webber’s 1864. Frindall thus included the entire roundarm era but also a substantial part of the underarm era.

The problem with 1815, if the intention is to include roundarm, is that roundarm did not begin in any real sense until 1827 and was not legalised until 1835; and even then the Laws had to be reinforced in 1845 by removing the benefit of the doubt from the bowler in the matter of his hand’s height when delivering the ball. For most of the period from 1815 to 1845, underarm bowling continued to prevail and so 1815 as the startpoint was resisted by champions of the "underarm era" which had existed from time immemorial.

For its part, the ACS decided against 1815 so that it could include the full set of Gentlemen v Players fixtures that began in 1806. It chose 1801 as a date of convenience and thereby set up a division between the 18th and 19th centuries. In its spring 2006 journal, the ACS admitted that it could not decide upon its position vis-à-vis 18th century records because of missing or incomplete scorecards. But it is by no means certain that there is a complete statistical record of matches between 1801 and 1825, especially given the loss of records in the catastrophic Lord's fire. Certainly, there are no complete bowling figures in that period and the surviving scorecards are similar in standard and content to 18th century scorecards.

The fire at Lord's occurred on the night of Thursday 28 July 1825. The pavilion burned down and many invaluable and irreplaceable records were lost. It is believed that these included unique scorecards of early matches. The main difficulty encountered by researchers before the Lord's fire is the absence of match details and there are numerous matches in the 18th century which are known about in name only, with no scores having survived. As the effective beginning of roundarm was in the aftermath of the Lord’s fire and given that records since the fire are believed to be complete, apart from some matters of detail, a more logical startpoint for the first-class statistical record might be the 1826 season.

When the ACS took its startpoint back to 1801 it gave further impetus to the view that the whole of the underarm era should be included in the first-class statistics. To achieve this, the statistical record of first-class cricket would commence in 1772 when, as described above, the compilation and retention of match scorecards became habitual. The handful of earlier scorecards, including the two in 1744, are arguably too isolated for inclusion. In this sense, the statistical record is divorced from the historical record which includes all first-class matches for which no scorecard has survived. According to one view published by the ACS and elsewhere [6], the point of origin for the historical record is 1660, or soon afterwards. Historical evidence points to this date, in the aftermath of the Restoration as the time when teams of "county strength" were first assembled. Using 1660 as the historical startpoint must encompass all matches that ultimately come to light; while 1772 acts as the current statistical startpoint.

In 2005, scorecards and other details of all known matches prior to 1801 were loaded into the CricketArchive database and there classified as "major" or "minor" pending an overall accord with the ACS and other sources about first-class status. CricketArchive’s major classification effectively states a view that the matches concerned were first-class providing they were not single wicket, the other form of major cricket that was popular in the 18th century.

CricketArchive is clear about the first-class startpoints in other countries and these are agreed by most sources.

Australia's first-class records begin in February 1851. In New Zealand, the original first-class match took place in January 1864. In the West Indies, the first match was in February 1865. First-class cricket in the other Test nations began much later. The inaugural first-class match in South Africa was also the country's first Test match in March 1889. In the sub-continent, the first match was in India in August 1892. In addition, first-class cricket in North America is deemed to have begun in 1878.

[edit] First-class career centuries

The main issues arising from the disagreement about W G Grace’s career totals are: (a) when did Grace score his hundredth first-class century; (b) how many first-class centuries did he score; and (c) when did Jack Hobbs overtake his record total of first-class centuries?

At 1pm on 17 May 1895, in the Gloucestershire v Somerset match at County Cricket Ground, Bristol, Sammy Woods bowled a slow full toss, perhaps deliberately, which W G Grace dispatched to the boundary. Woods walked down the pitch and shook hands with the great man who had just completed his hundredth hundred, a century of centuries. It was an occasion for celebration: poems were written, commemorative plates were produced, Grace’s health was widely toasted. WG went on to make 126 career centuries.

At the time, it was widely if not universally accepted that Grace's list of centuries included a score of 152 in 1873 for the Gentlemen to Canada Touring Team v XV of MCC; and a score of 113 in 1879 for Gloucestershire v Somerset. Later statisticians have challenged the status of these two matches and have proposed that Grace in fact completed his hundredth first-class century for Gloucestershire v Middlesex at Lord's on 30 May 1895 when he scored 169. According to their statistics, WG's career total was 124, not 126.

On the morning of 17 August 1925, a Somerset v Surrey match was taking place at County Cricket Ground, Taunton. Jack Hobbs, 92 not out overnight, turned Jimmy Bridges to leg and completed his 126th first-class century to equal Grace's career record. Percy Fender brought out a wine glass for Hobbs to enjoy a celebratory drink (as he was a teetotaler, it is reputed that the glass contained only ginger ale). As Hobbs had been near to his century the previous evening, the press were present in large numbers. They departed with their stories and on the next day Somerset recovered from a first innings deficit of 192 to leave Surrey needing 183 to win. Andy Sandham, Hobbs' opening partner, was in no hurry and Hobbs reached his 127th and world record century with the winning runs to give Surrey victory by 10 wickets. Such was the unexpected nature of Somerset's recovery that only a small crowd was there to celebrate.

If W G Grace's alternative figures are applied, Hobbs had created the world record (i.e., his 125th century) on 20 July 1925 when he scored 105 for Surrey v Kent at Blackheath. Hobbs has never surrendered the world record and he went on to make 197 career centuries. Or 199, according to another version (see below).

[edit] W G Grace's career batting figures

The table below summarises W G Grace's career figures with his original totals, as calculated by Wisden Cricketers' Almanack, and his alternative totals, that now appear on CricketArchive:

career I NO Runs Avge HS 100
'original' 1865-1908 1493 105 54896 39.55 344 126
'alternative' 1865-1908 1478 104 54211 39.45 344 124

The "extra" 15 innings took place over 10 matches [7], listed below with his scores in each innings, that were accepted as first-class during his career but have subsequently been challenged:

[edit] 1916 Wisden totals

Grace's "original" totals were compiled by F S Ashley-Cooper and added to his obituary in the 1916 Wisden. The only comment there on which matches were regarded as first-class is given on page 96:

The above figures, which have been checked most carefully throughout, will be found to differ in several instances from those given in the cricket publications of the sixties and seventies; but, considering that the handbooks of that period frequently contradicted each other, and that the averages given in one seldom, if ever, agreed with those tabulated in another, that is not surprising.

Ashley-Cooper compiled Grace's batting averages to the end of the 1896 season and these were published in a series of articles in Cricket: A Weekly Record of the Game in late 1896 and early 1897. In the first article, Ashley-Cooper says:

I have included MCC v Herts and MCC v Staffordshire, which, although not really first-class, have always been reckoned in WG's averages for 1873.

It is interesting to note that, between this 1896 article and the 1916 obituary, Ashley-Cooper omits 3 matches played by Grace for the South Wales Cricket Club during its tour of the London area in the latter half of July 1865:

Furthermore, Ashley-Cooper includes the Oxford University v Gentlemen of England match at Oxford in May 1866 which he had previously omitted.

This demonstrates that even after 1896 the career figures were sufficiently uncertain that he revised the list of first-class matches. It would have been difficult for Ashley-Cooper to include and exclude matches in which Grace scored a century but clearly the career run total was sufficiently uncertain that matches in which he did not score a century could be added or removed without much comment.

One aspect of Ashley-Cooper's analysis that must be questioned is his assertion that the performances of Grace in a certain match should be regarded as first-class but that performances by other players should not. Clearly, if a match is first-class, then all players taking part must have the game included in their own first-class records.

Incidentally, the 1896 Wisden includes Grace's career figures to the end of the 1895 season and this gives the same number of centuries as the 1916 edition but his season totals differ in some respects.

[edit] 1868 match

Gloucestershire matches are generally regarded as first-class from 1870 onwards. The 1869 edition of John Lillywhite's Cricketer's Companion (aka "Green Lilly") does not include the 1868 MCC v Gloucestershire match in Grace's first-class figures but Ashley-Cooper retrospectively chose to add it to his totals for the season.

[edit] 1873 matches

The 1873 games typify the loose manner in which statistics were compiled in those days. Grace's first-class batting aggregate for that season included his scores in the MCC matches against Hertfordshire and Staffordshire; and in the North v. South game at The Oval on 26 July. But his bowling in the same matches was ignored! The match on 26 July was in fact a one day filler that was played because the scheduled three-day North v. South match had finished a day early on 25 July. It is questionable if fillers have ever been regarded as major or first-class matches.

Grace's 1873 first-class aggregate was originally published in the 1874 edition of "Green Lilly" which includes the matches quoted in Grace's batting totals but not in his bowling totals. In the 1916 obituary in Wisden, Ashley-Cooper chose to add the wickets to Grace's bowling total rather than remove the runs from his batting total.

The inclusion of those wickets increased Grace's 1873 season bowling total to over 100 wickets and Ashley-Cooper realised that he had thereby manufactured the first-ever instance of a player performing the double. In all Wisdens before 1916, the records section has the first-ever double being performed by Grace in 1874.

Then, having included the three 1973 matches, Ashley-Cooper did the same with two similar matches in the 1872 season: Hertfordshire v MCC and another North v. South filler on 27 July. This is difficult to justify since these matches were not included in Grace's first-class totals that appear in the 1873 edition of "Green Lilly".

Another dubious match in 1873 is the one between an amateur team made up of those who had toured Canada and the USA in August and September 1872 and XV of the MCC. "Odds" matches are not usually regarded as first-class but there are exceptions, including two England v XIII of Kent matches played in 1878 and 1879, in which Grace took part. However, in the 1872 match, not only did the MCC team have 15 batsmen, they also had 15 players in the field. "Green Lilly" says: Before the publication of the names of the respective sides there was every prospect of a match at once worthy of the Transatlantic celebrity of Mr Fitzgerald's team and the match-making sagacity of the Club Committee, but when the lists came out, not a few intending spectators of the contest made up their minds for a disappointment. There really did not appear on the side of the fifteen 'metal' enough to encourage the hope of a good fight.

[edit] Status of Somerset matches

The remaining area of uncertainly relates to the status of Somerset CCC. Grace played a number of matches for Gloucestershire against Somerset between 1879 and 1885.

The 1879 and 1881 matches were not included in the first-class averages in "Green Lilly" or James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual (aka "Red Lilly"). In Wisden 1882, the editor states:

As it is, the untiring energy of the executive will be rewarded by seeing Somersetshire (sic) classed with the first-class counties in the coming season.

This statement clearly indicates that Wisden did not regard Somerset as first-class in 1881. For the 1882 season both "Green Lilly" and "Red Lilly" include Grace's performance against Somerset in his first-class figures and Wisden remarks that Somersetshire's debut among the first-class counties was disappointing.

Grace's scores against Somerset in 1883 are included in his first-class totals in "Green Lilly" and "Red Lilly" and similarly his scores in 1885 are included in "Red Lilly" first-class totals, "Green Lilly" having ceased publication by that time. Cricket: A Weekly Record of the Game differs from the annuals and excludes Somerset from its first-class averages for the seasons 1882 to 1885 [8]. The Somerset games that involved Grace from 1882 to 1885 were:

CricketArchive has Somerset as first-class between 1882 and 1885 but not before then. Ashley-Cooper chose to classify the 1879 and 1881 Somerset matches as first-class and Wisden has continued to include these matches in Grace's totals.

It is worth noting that until publication of the ACS lists in the 1970s, Somerset's own publications had treated the club as first-class only since its entry into the County Championship in 1891. Since the ACS published its lists, Somerset's publications have included the matches between 1882 and 1885 as first-class but not those before 1882.

[edit] W G Grace's career bowling figures

Although not so controversial, there are also different versions of Grace's career bowling figures. In the 1916 Wisden obituary, his figures are 51,545 runs conceded, 2864 wickets + 12 wickets taken in innings where the runs conceded is not known, resulting in an average of 17.99. For some unknown reason the modern publications using these totals have added the wickets totals together (i.e. 2876) and give a resulting average of 17.92. The 2006 Playfair Cricket Annual is particularly confusing in this regard as for Alfred Shaw the wicket total is given as 2026+1, indicating the 1 wicket where the runs conceded is not known.

The Cricket Archive totals are 50,980 runs conceded and 2809 wickets taken. Many of the differences are because of the exclusion of the 10 matches listed above, in which he took 68 wickets (including all 12 of the wickets taken in innings where the runs conceded are not known). There are however a number of instances where the bowling figures differ from those used by Ashley-Cooper. Three of these result in changes to the number of wickets taken:

[edit] Jack Hobbs

The situation with Jack Hobbs is simpler than with Grace and relates to a match for The Reef v MCC during the tour of South Africa in 1909-10; and the tour of India and Ceylon by the Maharajkumar of Vizianagram's team in 1930-31. He did not score a century in the 1909-10 match but scored two in the 1930-31 tour.

Given that he was near the end of his career in 1930-31, his centuries total is subject to variation from this time only, when he had already scored over 170 centuries. Therefore, the date of his 100th century is uncontested and the date on which he passed Grace's total of centuries is only affected by different versions of Grace’s own centuries total.

The table below summarises Jack Hobbs' career figures with his original totals, as calculated by Wisden, and his alternative totals, that now appear on CricketArchive:

career I NO Runs Avge HS 100
'original' 1905-1934 1315 106 61237 50.65 316* 197
'alternative' 1905-1934 1325 107 61760 50.70 316* 199

[edit] The Reef v MCC 1909-10

Playfair and Wisden figures include this match. CricketArchive does not. Hobbs scored 39 and 31.

Wisden 1931 (part 1, page 329) states:

I have also to acknowledge receipt of a letter from Mr. H.E. Holmes of Durban, enclosing the text of a pronouncement made by the South African Board of Control to the effect that, in the opinion of that body, the contest between the MCC team and The Reef at Vogelfontein on December 22 and 23, 1909, was not a first-class match. In the course of this encounter Hobbs scored 70 runs which are counted in his first-class aggregate. Seeing that the game was regarded, at the time it was played, as first-class and until a little while ago had been left in undisputed possession of that rank, the need for raising any question about the matter after more than twenty years is not at all obvious. In any circumstances, I should not advise the dragging up of what, with all due respect to the recent ruling of the South African Board, must remain a debatable matter. The Reef team included some Test match players and others who had appeared in Inter-State games so it certainly had considerable claims to be regarded as first-class and from that standing, I cannot, all things considered, agree after such a long lapse of time to reduce it. Outside the merits of the case, is there not something rather grotesque in the idea of a controlling body sitting in solemn conclave over so small a matter and deciding to upset what had been accepted for twenty years?

Wisden therefore decided to ignore the ruling and has continued to recognise this match as first-class. Playfair also recognises the match but other sources including CricketArchive have accepted the SABC ruling and do not recognise it. It is possible that the SABC thought it was a 2 day match, but Wisden 1911 clearly states that "not a ball could be bowled on the first and fourth days" so it was actually planned as a 4 day match.

[edit] 1930-31 tour of India and Ceylon

Playfair and Wisden figures exclude this tour. CricketArchive includes it. Hobbs played in 9 matches with 12 innings, 1 not out, 593 runs, 2 centuries. See below re Herbert Sutcliffe.

An MCC tour was planned to tour India in 1930-31 but due to civil disturbances this tour was cancelled [9]. The Maharajkumar of Vizianagram (aka Vizzy) determined to organise his own tour which included many of India's principal players. In addition, Jack Hobbs and Herbert Sutcliffe were engaged. The matches were not reported in Wisden and are not included in its career totals for either Hobbs or Sutcliffe. At the time, Wisden rarely reported on Indian cricket except for the Bombay Tournament. Vizzy's team also toured Ceylon and played 3 three-day matches that were similarly disregarded by Wisden. They were however prominently featured in The Cricketer Spring Annual for 1932. In these matches, Jack Hobbs scored two centuries in Ceylon while Herbert Sutcliffe scored one century in India and one in Ceylon.

[edit] Other cricketers

Although the variations in career totals are most significant in the cases of Grace and Hobbs, there are differences for many other players too. Clearly the inclusion or exclusion of matches noted above affects the totals of all cricketers playing in these matches and there are other matches where there is disagreement regarding their first-class status. As described above, the sport's early scorecards often show differences in match details which lead to different totals. This is more common with bowling and fielding figures.

A detailed comparison of differences between various publications was produced by Philip Bailey in 1987 [10][11].

[edit] Batting

Of those who scored 35,000 first-class runs the following are affected [12].

[edit] Liverpool and District v Yorkshire 1892

This is ranked as first-class by some sources, as are other Liverpool v Yorkshire matches between 1887 and 1894, but this particular match was not reported by contemporary publications. Playfair and Wisden figures exclude this match. CricketArchive includes it.

[edit] Surrey v Essex at Leyton 1896

Wisden 1897 and CricketArchive have different scorecard data. In the Surrey second innings, Wisden has Bobby Abel 4 and Tom Hayward 8 while CricketArchive has Abel 8 and Hayward 4.

[edit] The Reef v MCC 1909-10

Playfair and Wisden figures include this match. CricketArchive does not. See above re Jack Hobbs.

[edit] 1922-23 Indian domestic season

Playfair and Wisden figures exclude these matches. CricketArchive includes them.

  • Wilfred Rhodes – 4 matches, 8 innings, 1 not out, 247 runs

[edit] 1930-31 tour of India and Ceylon

Playfair and Wisden figures exclude this tour. CricketArchive includes it. See above re Jack Hobbs.

  • Herbert Sutcliffe – 7 matches, 10 innings, 1 not out, 532 runs, 2 centuries

[edit] Bowling

Of those who have taken 2,000 first-class wickets, the following are affected (this is limited to differences in the games played or wickets taken) [13].

[edit] Liverpool and District v Yorkshire 1892

See above. Playfair and Wisden figures exclude this match. CricketArchive includes it.

  • George Hirst – 1/40, 2/50

[edit] The Reef v MCC 1909-10

Playfair and Wisden figures include this match. CricketArchive does not.

  • Colin Blythe – 3/37
  • Frank Woolley – 2/8
  • Wilfred Rhodes – did not bowl

[edit] 1922-23 Indian domestic season

See above. Playfair and Wisden figures exclude these matches. CricketArchive includes them.

  • Wilfred Rhodes – 4 matches, 329 runs, 17 wickets

[edit] 1917-18 Indian domestic season

Playfair and Wisden figures include Bengal Governor's XI v Maharaja of Cooch-Behar's XI. CricketArchive does not.

[edit] 1918-19 Indian domestic season

Playfair and Wisden figures include Bengal Governor's XI v Maharaja of Cooch-Behar's XI and MC Bird's XI v Maharaja of Cooch-Behar's XI. CricketArchive does not.

  • Jack Newman – 5/94 (first match); 5/104, 4/34 (second match)

[edit] Other differences
  • Ewart Astill has 2431 wickets in Wisden and 2432 in CricketArchive
  • Jack White has 2356 wickets in Wisden and 2355 in CricketArchive

White's difference is sourced to Somerset v Surrey at Recreation Ground (Bath) in 1920. In the second innings, Wisden has Bill Hitch b White while CricketArchive has him b Jimmy Bridges.

[edit] References

  1. ^ Epps' standard work is A Collection of all the Grand Matches of Cricket 1771 to 1791 (1799)
  2. ^ Bentley is known for his lengthily titled A Correct Account of all the Cricket Matches which have been played by the Mary-le-bone Club, and all other principal matches, from the Year 1786 to 1822 inclusive (1823)
  3. ^ The Cricket Statistician, no. 2, pages 5 and 6 – The Classification of Matches by Rowland Bowen
  4. ^ The Cricket Statistician, no. 3, pages 25 and 26 – The Status of Matches in England and some other Countries by Rowland Bowen
  5. ^ in its journal The Cricket Statistician, no. 133
  6. ^ From Lads to Lord's; The History of Cricket: 1300 – 1787
  7. ^ The Cricket Statistician, no. 58, pages 13 to 18 – The Classification of Matches by Philip Bailey
  8. ^ The Cricket Statistician, no. 4, pages 22 to 27 First-Class Match List 1882-1914 by Philip Bailey
  9. ^ Ramachandra Guha, A Corner of a Foreign Field - An Indian History of a British Sport, Picador, 2001
  10. ^ The Cricket Statistician, no. 59, pages 7 to 11 The Career Record Evolution by Philip Bailey
  11. ^ The Cricket Statistician, no. 60, pages 42 to 46 Corrections to Career Records by Philip Bailey
  12. ^ Playfair Cricket Annual 2006 (page 221) compared to CricketArchive
  13. ^ Playfair Cricket Annual 2006 (pages 222/223) compared to CricketArchive

[edit] External sources

[edit] Further reading

  • H S Altham, A History of Cricket, Volume 1 (to 1914), George Allen & Unwin, 1962
  • Derek Birley, A Social History of English Cricket, Aurum, 1999
  • Bill Frindall, Wisden Book of Cricket Records, Wisden, 1998 (4th edition)
  • John Major, More Than A Game, HarperCollins, 2007
  • Arthur Haygarth, Scores & Biographies, Volume 1 (1744-1826), Lillywhite, 1862
  • Arthur Haygarth, Scores & Biographies, Volume 2 (1827-1840), Lillywhite, 1862
  • Roy Webber, The Playfair Book of Cricket Records, Playfair Books, 1951
  • Roy Webber, The Book of Cricket Records, Playfair Books, 1963 (concise edition)
  • Wisden Cricketers’ Almanack – various editions