User talk:VandalismCorrecter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, VandalismCorrecter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Garion96 (talk) 16:17, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "{{{1}}}"

Decline reason: "Nobody demands anything on wiki. In addition your username would warrant a usernameblock --Tawker 08:01, 14 August 2006 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

In accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy, i demand to be unblocked. I have been blocked unfairly and unduely. I have been accused of being another user by the user Deathrocker, for reverting a vandalistic edit they made (they blanked over half an article).

The user has claimed me to be the user Leyasu, a user i assume that Deathrocker has some discernable disagreement with.

The user made several appeals to several admins and the administrators noticeboard, changing his story several times. He also vandalised my user page, reverted every edit i made and also attacked me verbally calling me a myriad of names.

An administrator who has a problem with the user Leyasu as well, as banned me claiming i am Leyasu without any reason or just evidence. The administrator has also refused to respond to email that i have sent.

This adminstrator seems to have jumped blind sightedly at the first mentioning of the name Leyasu and banned me. And i demand that as i have done nothing to violate the blocking policy, except be harrased and claimed as this Leyasu user by a user who's vandalism i reverted, i am unblocked. VandalismCorrecter.

Other admins will want to look at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Leyasu_sock_blocked. Circeus 02:05, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

That is the user who blocked me, without any proof that there is a connection between me and this Leyasu user. He himself, despite the arbirrition enforcement board saying there is no evidence of me being this Leyasu user, is using slanderous names.

The user also states on the resulting location of that link, that he refuses to deal with my case, and has blocked me unfairly, refusing to deal with my email.

I thus therefore am entitled to being unblocked as i have been blocked for reasons not on the blocking policy: the blindsighted blocking by an admin, due to the name dropping of a user i have not heard of before now. VandalismCorrecter.

I've filed a request for checkuser involving VandalismCorrecter and Leyasu, which is posted at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Leyasu and WP:RFCU. Unless it comes back confirmed or highly likely, I have recommended that Circeus unblock VandalismCorrecter after the request comes back. Those requests typically take a couple of days to get filled, although they do give us a more formal record of whether or not there are any sockpuppets involved. I filed the request mainly because Leyasu and VandalismCorrecter edit similar articles from the same IP range. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 04:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)