Talk:Vanuatu branch of The Scout Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scouting Wiki Project Vanuatu branch of The Scout Association is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Melanesia This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Melanesia, which collaborates on articles related to Melanesia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Deletion of this article

Well, the prod tag has been removed, so the next move is up to the editor who added it to put the artcile to AfD. I hope he does not do so. As User:Rlevse who removed the prog tag said, membership of WOSM is not a criteria for having an article. Scouting on Vanuata is part of the Scout Association of the UK and this is of interest in itself to readers given that Vanuata was a joint colony before independence of the UK and France. We are moving to have articles on all sections of the Scout Association at County, Area or Branch (as in this case) level, but not of course at lower levels of Groups or Districts. These articles will expand, given time. --Bduke 01:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sea Scouts

There clearly are Sea Scouts in Vanuatu but the link - Sea Scouting in Vanuatu, is not much use at present. I've moved it here in the hope that it might be better in future. --Bduke 08:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)