Talk:Vanessa Fox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

An individual covered by or significantly related to this article, Vanessa Fox, has edited Wikipedia as
Vanessafox (talk · contribs)

[edit] Questions

If you, Vanessa, find this page, please help us by answering the questions below. (Other editors, feel free to add to the list.) Jehochman (^Talk/_Contrib) 11:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

What is your year of birth?
Can you a provide a list of news appearances or references to reliable sources? We've got primary sources. We are looking for secondary sources.

Hi there,

I was born in the fantastic year of 1972. I'm not sure what types of sources you'd like, but here are a few things about me and stuff I've done:

Vanessafox 20:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC) vanessafox

Thanks, and good work finding this page so quickly. The sources are very helpful. We don't know who owns your userid, so could you possibly publish your year of birth on your blog so we have it in the public record? Jehochman (^talk/_contrib) 20:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Verifying a 'Fact' by Having The Subject Post Said Fact in Their Blog!?!?!?!

Are you kidding? The notability of some of these bio stubs are so unbelievably questionable. Why does this person have an entry? And how is asking them to post something in their blog verifiable? Where is the third party in that equation? Pathetic. And people wonder why Wikipedia is regarded as such a disreputable source of information. Because the admins are self-serving and self-congratulatory, and generally believe that they are more important than anyone else. So infuriating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.166.151 (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jehochman

Why do these Google employees keep getting their own 'articles'? Why are you allowing that? i agree with the previous poster, you admins are way too masturbatory and pretentious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.237.14.248 (talk) 06:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)