Talk:Van Orden v. Perry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] Plurality

The plurality opinion section doesn't seem to give any real information about the opinion. For instance, the reasoning behind it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.67.160.216 (talk) 05:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Grammar

The first point in Breyer's concurrence according to this article is: "The monument's 40-year history on the Texas state grounds indicates that nonreligious aspects of the tablets' message have been predominate." If that's what Breyer actually wrote, than a [sic] needs to be placed at the end of it, since the final word should be "predominant". Tim Ross (talk) 20:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)