Talk:Van Morrison/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Attack?

I'm not sure how to include this in a encyclopia fashion way, but Morrison reportedly has "Launched an attack" on the music industry and the Internet. I could not find for certain the original source for the quotes, but different sources seem to be taking it from contactmusic.com. The stuff he is quoted for is interesting and I think it should be included. I'm just beggining to understand Wikipedia, so I wasn't sure about putting all the information on the article page.

Here are the links to the two stories

http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/van%20morrison%20slams%20internet_28_02_2006

http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/van%20morrison%20slams%20commercial%20music%20industry_01_03_2006

Needs more

This article remains kind of thin, especially from 1977 on — unfortunately I don't know that work well enough to contribute. And I don't think the article really captures what makes Van so special ... the Astral Weeks article actually does a better job of that, I hope readers find it. Wasted Time R 03:48, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The phrase "Many consider his performance of "Caravan" to be the climax of The Last Waltz, Martin Scorsese's 1978 film of The Band's farewell concert." sounds odd. It either is the climax (ie in popular parlance, the end) or it isn't. I would suggest "high point".--Attila the Pooh 11:38, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Done and done - Akamad 04:49, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

But do many consider that ? Or is just many Van Morrison fans who think that ? -- Beardo 15:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

That's a valid point. I might try to look for some reviews of it. - Akamad 01:20, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

I changed the line after reading some reviews. Some state it as a highlight, but not enough to warrant the previous statement. - Akamad 02:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Irish/Northern Irish

He isn't an Irish singer, he is Northern Irish. They are different countries. It is like calling a Scottish singer an English singer.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.223.243 (talk • contribs)

"I'm Irish and a British subject."[1]

"I'm Irish, American and British. I don't think I'm any one of those things. I think I'm Irish. I think I'm American. I think I'm British."[2]

Van frequently describes himself as "Irish", so while it seems to offend you, it apparently doesn't offend him. Camillus (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Northern Ireland is not a country, nor is it a province: it is a region within the UK. Van Morrison often refers to himself as Irish. I have reverted back to Irish as Van has described himself as Irish. Iolar

Irish can refer to anyone from the island of Ireland, not just those from the country (Republic of) Ireland. -- Beardo 15:50, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

I've just placed his place of residence into the intro as I think that is important and the fact that his partner is Michelle Rocca and they have a child together. Also, I have corrected the reference to Them as a British band - citation: http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:vx1ibk596akc

The catagories "British Musician" and "British Songwriter" have been added. Is this correct?BuffaloBob 00:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I think it is, technically. Though he also considers himself "Irish". One can be a Scot and British, Welsh and British, English and British and those from Northern Ireland (who agree) can refer to themselves as Irish and British. Stephenjh 01:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

To be fair to the original poster on this subject, when back home in Belfast, or Northern Ireland generally, Van Morrison describes himself as Northern Irish. In truth it is quite common for Northern Irish people to simply refer to themselves as Irish when abroad, especially when in the United States, for two reasons. Firstly, many from Northern Ireland have found themselves received in foreign countries much more warmly and in much more friendly a manner if they introduce themselves as Irish rather than British. I do not state this as a slur on being British but merely as an observation that many from Northern Ireland who claim both nationalities have discovered over the years. This is particularly true in former British colonies like the United States. Secondly Northern Irish people often find themselves having to go into a deeper explanation of their nationality if they describe themselves as Northern Irish abroad, again especially in the United States. In some situations stating that you are Northern irish can also lead to verbal attacks from some who hold strong Irish Republican sympathies. This is less common today but in the early seventies this was particularly acute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.22.20 (talk) 10:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

He's both. Simple as that. The above person takes a lot of words to say this and managed to intermingle it with a lot of bollocks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.176.221 (talk) 00:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Scientologist?

According to the Guardian, he is [3] yet there's no mention of it in the article? --Hn 13:04, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

I added a reference to it on the article. He mentions it on an interview: http://www.harbour.sfu.ca/~hayward/van/reviews/1985newage.html. - Akamad 13:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)


This is absurd, Van Morrison was not formally affiliated with Scientology, but like William S. Burroughs had a passing interest in Dianetics. Van Morrison is formerly a member of the Church of Ireland.

The two cited references prove nothing. The Guardian ref says that he said he was in an interview in the 80s (presumably the interview cited in in the second ref). In the interview itself, van gives the idea short-shrift, just something that he was interested in at the time. Hubbard was "credited" on his 1985 album. Big deal. Van is a very ecletic, complex individual. You could easily say he was a Buddhist, a Jehovah Witness, an existentialist etc. etc. The idea that these refs "prove" that he is a Scientoligist is just tosh. Camillus (talk) 22:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
The line I added to the article was: "Despite stating that he is a Christian, he was linked to Scientology, after he gave a special thanks to L. Ron Hubbard on his 1986 album, Inarticulate Speech of the Heart." WIth this reference given: [4]. I certainly believe this is a fair statement to make, but perhaps you don't, any comments on how to improve it? - Akamad 00:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Well let's see: your ref gives this one sentence where Scientology is mentioned, in passing : Morrison has stated that he is a Christian, but he admits his involvement in Scientology, transcendental meditation, and assorted New Age practices.. First, it's unacceptable, as - where does Van "admit his involvement with Scientology"? Perhaps the interview in 1985, where he gives it short-shrift? This is just an example of a writer putting words in Van's mouth. Van hates to be categorised, and can even be quite mischevious about it, throwing gullible interviewers off on wild goose-chases. If it's got to be mentioned at all, I would suggest something like : "Morrison is a complex individual, who has cited many eclectic influences on his life and music. He gave a special thanks to L. Ron Hubbard on his 1986 album..., although he has never been formally associated with Scientology or any other Church." Something like that. Anything more is just pure speculation. Camillus (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
I incorporated your text on to the article. - Akamad 10:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Church of Ireland

In a 1989 Q Magazine interview conducted by Spike Milligan, Van Morrison responds to a question about his religious affiliation with "Well theoretically I'm Church Of Ireland". http://www.harbour.sfu.ca/~hayward/van/reviews/1989august.html

It is however interesting, that no matter what evidence of Van's Anglican roots are put forth, there will always be doubters and hecklers.

"Growing up in a Church of Ireland (often wrongly described as Protestant) family ..." This seems odd. I don't know anyone in Northern Ireland who wouldn't describe the Anglican church as Protestant. Can someone explain?

The Church Of Ireland is part of the Anglican communion - strictly speaking Anglicanism is not a Protestant church but a reformed Catholic church. Basically Anglicans accept apostlic succession (the church and it's history is the source of the religion) - true Protestantism is a revealed faith - each member comes to God individually. Of course historically Anglicanism has become seen as a protestant faith but some members are much closer to the Catholic church than Calvin.

Take it from someone who has lived all their life in Northern Ireland. If you're Church of Ireland you are a Protestant. I suggest to anyone questioning this point, whether it be right or wrong, to stand for half an hour in Belfast city centre, find ten people who are church of Ireland and, once assembled together, tell them they are actually Catholics. Correct you may be but they would still run to the nearest shop that sells baseball bats to beat the living hell out of you. So once again, for those not certain, In Northern Ireland at least, if you're Church of Ireland you are a Protestant. The comment above about being often wrongly described as Protestant is as dumb as someone adding to this paragraph the words {technically no shops in Belfast sell baseball bats because the sport is not played there} —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.101.22.20 (talk) 09:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes! Yes! he above comment is 100% true - I do wish "others" would stop interjecting on Irish-British relationships. It seems the only people who truly understand the matter is those two nations themselves (and no one deliberately misunderstands more than the Americans). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.176.221 (talk) 00:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Guitar? ==

I'm curious, what kind of electric guitar is played during the first few bars in 'Wild Night' and 'Gloria'? (PS- excuse me if I haven't quite gotten the hang of editing Wikipedia)

Nothing like starting out an entry with some racism.

"No white man sings like him."

If the observation that "no black man sings like him" were placed in an article on opera singer Paul Robeson, the howls of "racism" would be loud indeed.

The observation that somehow Morrison is elevated to a realm where whites, inherently limited due to their race, are unable to climb is explicitly racist and has no place here.

I am sick of the casual anti-White racism epidemic on Wikipedia. BulldogPete 10:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't think it's a racist comment. But if you feel it is, feel free to remove the line. - Akamad 21:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm not going to take it upon myself to remove it, but I think "Bulldog" arguably has a point. 24.6.66.193 00:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

How is the term "No white man sings like him." racist? I don't understand. It's a bold statement that could be open to many interpretations, but refers to no other 'race', nor makes any comparison with any other 'race'. I don't read any racism here. Stephenjh 19:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

It means that Morrison can sing black music like no other white man (and if someone wants to dispute the existence of black music, then I'll be happy to debate). Morrison's tone, and especially when singing Blues, has conjured many statements that he "sings like a black man". There are accounts of people mistaking him for a black man before actually seeing a photo of him or being told otherwise (sorry, I can't cite that directly at the moment). I don't think that it is a racist sentiment at all, and if it is then it's one that is shared by many. I defy anyone to have listened to Elvis Presely without seeing a photo of him and say he wasn't white, or James Brown and say that he wasn't black. It does seem that tones carry differently between both "races". If humans have different racial physical attributes, what's to say we don't have different racial vocal attributes?--Bentonia School 11:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

"Morrison can sing black music like no other white man". No offence meant to the above wiki' editor but if that is what it means, then I think that's utter tosh and a completely POV statement that should be removed. Stephenjh 09:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

It's not POV by a wiki editor, it's a statement made by a well known professional critic and carries weight about the ideas shared by many regarding Morrison's music. Therefore, it makes sense to keep it in the article. And there's no if about if we allow ourselves to be less slanted by pretentious armchair scholarly ideas and understand the quote on its surface. It isn't rocket surgery, after all. --Bentonia School 09:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Janet Planet

As far as I can tell (from Johnny Rogan's biography) that Janet Planet was never a musician, but rather an actress.

Steve D.

Wavelength

You say Wavelength was not well received by critics. I recall it being named one of the top 10 rock albums of the year by Time Magazine. I think they said something like "More Morrison magic"

Horribly POV

"The new decade saw Morrison following his own muse regardless of the commercial consequences. In 1980, he took a group of outstanding musicians with him to Super Bear, a studio in the French Alps on the site of a former abbey, to record his most daring and unclassifiable album to date. The album, Common One although not well received critically is perhaps one of Morrison's greatest achievements and began his journey in an entirely new musical direction in the 1980's.

"The last four songs show Morrison almost completely free from self-consciousness and at his innovative best, lyrically and vocally.

"He gave his first performance as a child with a spirited rendition of Lead Belly's "Goodnight Irene"." Pure POV. anybody want to take a stab at rewriting it? — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 03:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Changed POV questioned parts

I hope that the changes I've made will be sufficient and would like to remark that I have taken special care to only include material that can be cited by other sources in reference material I have. (5) books written about him and also I've read numerous interviews and reviews. The article before I started working on it, was POV in the other direction and also had numerous inaccuracies. So if anyone has any suggestions about how it can be improved, I hope you will respond to me at my talk page. I've always been a person who studies subject matter extensively and than moves on to something else. I've formed no opinion of Van Morrison other than he has made a great contribution to music, and sometimes has fallen short of his talents, probably because of personality flaws. (I think anyone familiar with his work would agree with this) Thanks for any suggestion anyone can offer..... Agadant 13:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I think you've done a great job. --Dweller 13:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Further Thoughts on Horribly POV (?)

The remark about Van Morrison's "spirited" rendition of "Goodnight Irene" came from Johnny Rogan's No Surrender and was from interviews he had with neighbors and childhood acquaintances of Morrison's. He did use the adjective "rousing" and I changed it to "spirited" because I was more comfortable with that word. So I've now taken out any adjective but it was his first performance as a child and I can't see why I should remove that. The use of the word "outstanding" in referring to the musicians on "Common One" is an adjective I think they have earned, but I removed it. I think anyone who has heard "Common One" would have to agree that it is daring and unclassifiable and Morrison would have had to know it would not be commercially successful. I do think he can be said to be following his own muse, or if not, what was he doing? The remarks about the second side of "into the Music" being free from self-consciousness and innovative...lyrically and vocally.. is also something I've often run across worded differently in several reviews. (Also would have to be agreed to by anyone who has listened to it. It's rather startling at first listen, because it's so different from what we've heard before.) Once again, Morrison had to know these songs were not "radio friendly." I've tried mostly to be unbiased but "fair" to Morrison and also to write an interesting, informative article, showing how he has been truly unusual and influential as stated in the opening of the article. (Which I did not write.) The parts I have written ( everything that was considered POV) have been in keeping ( I thought) and consistent with the rest of the article. I always kept anything that someone else had written, (if not inaccurate or inappropriately lengthly) and wrote around it. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? In reading articles about other musicians, (Graded GA) I honestly can't see why this is considered POV. Especially now that I've removed the few adjectives or sentences that might be questionable. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?? Agadant 02:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I would agree and am going to boldy remove the POV tag as it appears that the issues raised above have been addressed. Good work. -- No Guru 02:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Concept of compilation

Concept of "compilation" seems a bit incoherent/inconsistent. It doesnt make any taxonomic sense to make Live at Austin City Limits Festival a "Compilation". Its a live show. To be consistent you would have to make other live Morrison albums compilations " Live in Belfast, Night in San Francisco, Skiffle sessions etc. Philosophers Stone is not strictly a compilation either its a fresh album of unreleased music recorded at disparate times. A better schema would be Studio Albums, Live Albums, Compilations, defined as assemblages from pre-existing recordings, and even then you are going to get the odd hybrid, like this forthcoming film music compilation which includes an unreleased live version of Moondance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.97.213.86 (talk • contribs)

Seems sensible. --Dweller 09:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Does making Live at Austin City Limits Festival a Limited Edition category seem like a good solution at least for this album? Hopefully he will continue this trend. I think this makes the compilation category more clear as the Live at Belfast etc. albums were recorded at one time period and the Best of etc. albums incl. VM at the Movies were different time periods. Does anyone have more experience than I do (none) in adding photos etc. to new pages? VM at the Movies has a new page but there is a photo available to add. Would Live at Austin ever qualify for it's own page? The newly released DVD Live at Montreux does not have a page, also.---- Agadant 12:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

203.97.213.86 Sorry to have changed your entry w/o discussion (put it under compilations)--I would have but you didn't have a user page. Hope you'll make one. And hope you'll continue to be interested in this article and improving it.----Agadant 13:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Common One

Does anyone have any thoughts on the importance of Common One in Morrison's career? Is the longer paragraph maybe a better description of why one of the more obscure albums he recorded also one of the most important in terms of his development as an artist. Nothing is my own personal opinion but the combined opinions of biographers and critics. Into the Music is often called his last great album or masterpiece and I've tried to correlate why the overwhelming critical acclaim on that one may have caused Morrison to overreach with Common One and then retreat (to more common ground) when the reviews on it were so brutal and even sometimes personal. Appreciate any feedback. I'm not an accomplished writer, only trying hard. Thanks, Agadant 14:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

It was indeed a very important album for Morrison as it basically marked the (short term) end to his delving into mysticism. It was his last album that really explored human nature/soul in a mystic light. Regardless of that, the pretentiousness of wikipedia and those who subscribe to it will likely disagree with any inclusion of such in the article. --Bentonia School 09:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Lack of references

First off, I would like to say that this article reads really well. But for it to become a Good Article or Featured Article, it really needs footnotes. For information on how to add footnotes, see WP:FOOT and WP:REF. Right now, that is the biggest thing preventing this article from being really great. Cheers. – Heaven's Wrath   Talk  04:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Footnotes

Can some kind soul (which is everyone who edits wikipedia) help enter the footnotes? I'll admit I don't know how, and have limited time right now to learn. Or if someone wants to write me a crash course on it to my talk page, I'll try. ....Agadant 15:21, 25 January 2007

The References/footnotes will be out of order for a while till I can get them all done. Hopefully, everyone will be patient. I'm having a time understanding how to do the citation footnotes so I may save them for last...Agadant 21:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Need Reference: Van Morrison said years later in an interview, "Of my whole career, the shining moment was when I sang "Gloria " on stage with Jim Morrison. (71.194.249.161) contributed this but so far, I haven't seen a source.....Agadant 21:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Footnotes are almost finished with great help from MAL. Agadant 00:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Auto peer review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
  • If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km2, and pounds -> lb.[?]

*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]

  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
  • Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.[?]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • it has been
    • arguably
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): wasn't, Don't.
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
  • Please provide citations for all of the {{fact}}s.[?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Mal 02:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

John Minihan

Does anyone have a source for the John Minihan reference. Don't know when it went in article or by whom. I've seen enough photographs of Van Morrison by Minihan to feel it has credence but surprised to find it hard to verify. Can someone help? Thanks, Agadant 20:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Ive tried googling it with no luck. I think it is going to be a difficult sentence to source and wonder how valuable it is to the article. The John Minihan article itself makes no claim about being Van Morrison's official photographer. I think the Minihan section could be safely removed without harming the article. Just my thoughts. -- No Guru 23:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, No Guru, I had come to that conclusion myself but glad to see someone agree. So I'll remove it now. If someone comes up with something, we can always put it back. Agadant 02:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Main Image was deleted on 03-09-07 but replaced on 03-10-07

  • Main image has been replaced with a very current, really great photo of Van Morrison. This is a tremendous contribution to the article.

Song articles

Would like to note that I've started to add some more song articles that need additional information, if anyone is interested in adding to them. (with cited sources, of course, if necessary) Agadant 17:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

    • If the material is readily verified or apparent, it doesn't need sources.

Albums

Much of Van Morrison's Mercury/Polydor catalogue (70s through 90s) appears to be out of print - only used copies are available on Amazon.com, for example. Does anyone know why this might be?

  • I think that when he went to a new label, Manhattan EMI, he had all rights to the albums in question and took them with him. Maybe there's a time span before they can be reissued. Agadant 22:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
It appears that in June 1997, there was a reissue from a previous label, so this is probably what will happen again. Agadant 20:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Until such a time as there is an actual announcement of a reissue project to be undertaken by whatever label Van is signed to now - his last disc came out on the Lost Highway subsidiary of the Univeral Music Group - the discography should list that the majority of his albums are out of print, indeed an indefensible position from a standpoint of cultural heritage. Not that record companies are necessarily concerned with such things.PJtP 21:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
There does not seem to be any reason to believe that the albums will not be reissued as soon as possible. Some of them, such as The Best of Van Morrison, It's Too Late to Stop Now, Avalon Sunset are among his most popular and The Best of Van Morrison has been his best seller since 1990. I'm sure there is interest in the subject but there is no reason it should have a place in the Van Morrison main article until there is something official.
"The post-Bang era has seen Van gain increasing control over his music, to the point where he is now essentially his own independent label (Exile Productions), retaining full production control of each album, and delivering the completed product to the record company for marketing and distribution." (This is from the Van Morrison Unofficial Website) I think it shows that the record company Polydor is not to blame....His last album Van Morrison at the Movies - Soundtrack Hits was issued by EMI.Agadant 22:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Found this same question about the deleted albums on ask.billboard.com Vanished Morrisondated February 9, 2007, with a similar answer.Agadant 16:12, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
The latest information about the availability of these albums appeared on the Official Van Morrison website on August 16, 2007, stating an exclusive release at the ITunes Store. In October 2007, it was announced that he signed a contract with his former record label Polydor giving them rights to his back catalogue of albums and that they would be re-released in batches of six.Agadant 03:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

I removed the phrase: Obstensibly to be close to the area where Bob Dylan was residing

This has been a part of the article for a long time, and I did find that it could be referenced to a 1998 interview with Janet Minto, Morrison's ex-wife. But further reading revealed that Graham Blackburn says he persuaded Morrison to move with him to Woodstock, and that Van was very keen because he was a big fan of The Band who resided there. So due to conflicting accounts, I took it out of the article. The Blackburn account is in Steve Turners book, Too Late to Stop Now p.95.Agadant 00:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Changed influences

I changed one of the artist who was said to be influenced by Van Morrison, James Morrison. The one that is influences (in his own words) is Paolo Nutini who is sometimes confused with James Morrison.

  • Thanks for your contribution. I added a reference source for him but also put James Morrison back as he is often said to be influenced by Van and others too.Agadant 22:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Influences- The Wallflowers

Who are you to say which musician belongs in front of a list of influences??? They are all noted, thus order is irrelevant.

The beginning part of the influence paragraph has been in the article for a long time. It states his influence on many "Major" artists such as U2, Bruce Springsteen, etc. that are his contemporaries. The Wallflowers is a younger group, and not really a part of the beginning major group. Do you honestly feel like The Wallflowers is one of the major artists that were influenced? I know why maintaining the order is important to me but not why putting The Wallflowers first is important to you.Agadant 04:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Contractual obligation info?

Should there be a mention on the page about Van Morrison's negative relations with Bang that led him to record an entire studio session of crap to fulfill his contract? I've heard clips floating around and found this web page that doesn't offer much detail. Tomt 5 May 2007

  • That 'crap' is available on iTunes and makes for some very 'interesting' listening. I guess someone is even making some money from those 1 minute 'ditties'. Stephenjh 15:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
    • There is something in the article that says he fulfilled a highly unusual clause that required him to submit 36 original songs within a year and he fulfilled it by doing 32 nonsense songs in one session. (Guess he had already given them 4 songs) This clause was added in when Warner Bros Records tried to buy him out and Warner also paid an undisclosed amount of money for his contract. If you know the stories behind each of the little songs he made up on the spot, they actually show an amazing amount of ingenuity and talent for one so young. Agadant 00:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC) The article on Astral Weeks also gives more details about the problems Morrison had with Bang Records.

Changed active date in infobox

I changed the active year from1963 to 1960 in the infobox due to quote by Van Morrison that he became a professional musician at 15 years old. There's no place to reference it there but I put it in Wikiquote: Van Morrison. Agadant 00:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Image for The Best of Van Morrison Volume 3

Can someone knowledgeable in this area, upload an album image cover for this album? It was released already in June, 2007. Agadant 01:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I've added the album cover. - Akamad 01:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, Akamad, Agadant 03:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:CanYouFeelTheSilenceCover.gif

Image:CanYouFeelTheSilenceCover.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:39, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

"One of the best selling albums of the 1990s"

The claim is false. The Morrison album sold ~2 million copies. 1990s artists with single album sales over TEN million copies include S. Twain, W. Houston, A. Morissette, G. Brooks, Hootie & B., Santana, Backstreet Boys, B. Spears, Metallica, Boyz II Men, Kenny G, Matchbox 20, TLC, Pearl Jam, Jewel, N Sync, C. Dion, Creed, MC Hammer, Mariah Carey, Green Day, Nirvana, No Doubt, Kid Rock, Madonna, Dixie Chicks, Notorious B.I.G., as well as various soundtracks and greatest hits collections. There are many lists available online, including Wikipedia; you will not find Morrison's hits collection on them.208.120.226.72 (talk) 03:21, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm looking for the discussion. So far I only see that you feel free to remove sourced material at your discretion. The book that I referenced says that he sold 6 million copies world wide and that was in 2003. It also says exactly as I stated "[ONE] of the best selling albums of the 90s. A recent Polydor article says he has sold over 40 million albums worldwide.PR newswire on behalf of Polydor. If he only sold 2 million copies of his BEST SELLING album how was that possible? My entry is referenced- yours is not. I could be wrong but not according to the figures I have furnished, you only tell who sold more. Agadant (talk) 04:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Music of Ireland in Wikipedia lists him as #3 (55 million sales) of the 5 best selling Irish acts of all time. Do you think you're perhaps only thinking of American artists? Agadant (talk) 04:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
No, I'm not, although I was referring to American sales: the 2+ million total I saw is the U.S. statistic. Typically, more than 50% of an album's worldwide sales are North American, though there are many exceptions (possibly including VM's Greatest Hits). However, the list above cites 30 albums-- all released during the 1990s-- that have been authenticated by the RIAA as having sold between 10 and 20 million North American copies. See for yourself at: http://members.aol.com/PaulHry/music/riaa.html (among other sources). The worldwide totals for each are obviously greater than that, just as Morrison's GH may have more than doubled its U.S. take. Then there are a slew of other 1990s albums in the 7-to-9-million range, and remember, a lot of albums going down to the 2-and-3-million range on RIAA's chart have sold 6+ million worldwide. Hey, I love Morrison's stuff, too, and I've bought about 25 of those 40,000,000 albums he's sold. But to say that his GH album is "one of the best selling albums of the 1990s" is simply not true unless you stretch the criteria beyond the breaking point.208.120.226.72 (talk) 08:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
While the Irish World link does say what it says, it's still a vaporous, unsupported P.R. claim in a "hooray for Van!" capsule review. And it simply isn't supported by any official sales table; in fact, it's contradicted. The Musician Guide website (http://www.musicianguide.com/biographies/1608002257/Van-Morrison.html) says flatly that it sold 2 million. Entertainment Weekly (http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,307646,00.html) says that "Best of" and "Avalon Sunset" COMBINED to sell 2.2 million through 1993. Those links, and the RIAA numbers, are more authoritative than a "what's on sale this week" blurb. Best Of Morrison could only be considered one of "the best-selling 1990s albums" if compared to ALL albums released in that decade, which is not the usual standard. It most certainly was not among the top 150 best-selling albums of the 1990s. It's a lot safer, and accurate, to assert that it's Morrison's top-selling album of the period. Maybe it could be established that "Best of VM" placed among the best-selling greatest hits collections, although I don't know whether that's true.208.120.226.72 (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
208.120.226.72--The Entertainment Weekly article is dated 1993! - 2 -1/2 million albums sold in US and still 7 years to go for the decade. All the figures everywhere are based on US sales and Morrison had not been a contender in the US since the 80s when he moved back to Europe. But you know what, I'm going to not argue the point of (One) of (?) best selling albums of the 90s as referenced, over your expert decision that it was his best selling album of the 90's, although I have changed it to read his best selling album of all time. I think you've taken up enough space on the talk page, so hopefully you'll now go on to checking out the cited sales figures for all the other artists. Agadant (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, 1993, just as the previous post said. By 1993, the album had already enjoyed its first and largest sales period; catalogue records don't tend to sell better in their 8th or 12th year than upon their release. Three years later, the music industry pretty well has a handle on what its top Christmas 2004 sellers have turned out to be. If you were to quintuple the reported sales numbers of 2.2 million to account for catalogue longevity and worldwide popularity-- as generous and unlikely as that math would be-- you'd only just be getting up to the 40th-best U.S.-only sales totals for 1990s albums. (Remember, that 2.2 mil in '93 included Avalon Sunset, too.) In any event, "my expert decision" is no more expert than the RIAA sales figures. Besides, your latest edit had the happy result of making the article more accurate, which is GOOD. You found a much better citation. Don't be irritated by it, be glad of it! So speaketh The Decider!208.120.226.72 (talk) 01:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:VanMorrison-WavelengthCoverMay2005.jpg

Image:VanMorrison-WavelengthCoverMay2005.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Personal Info

Apparently an anonymous editor has a privacy issue with: <removed, cite a diff if you must. John Reaves 04:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)> Anyone else see anything wrong with the content? --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 15:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm a strong advocate of protecting a public figure from rumors and unsubstaniated and disputed information in Wikepedia, especially. But this information on the births of the two children with Michelle Rocca is available all over the internet and was printed in numerous newspapers; Van Morrison, to my knowledge has "never" disavowed it. If this information can be removed by an anonymous editor then carefully sourced information is a joke and so is Wikipedia. Agadant (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
The 1st 2 sentences sources: [5] is under the heading "News & Gossip" and [6] is pretty stubby. Both of these read like tabloid journalism and wp:blp states that "We are not tabloid journalism, we are an encyclopedia." I don't have access to the books for the third sentence. Sentences 4 and 5 are sourced to another stubby source [7]. Are there any reliable non-tabloidy sources for sentences 1-2, 4-5? -- Jeandré, 2008-04-15t22:04z
There is an article published in the Belfast Telegraph quoting Van Morrison's mother on receiving the news of her new grandson, etc. Link: It's Van: the Mam that was published on September 22, 2007 that leaves no doubt that the information on Michelle Rocca and the children is not rumor or gossip. (This source has been already used in the main article in the early years section for a reference for information on Violet Morrison.) Agadant (talk) 01:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Quote by a named reporter (Claire McNeily) in Morrison's hometown newspaper: "The new arrival is Van's second child with his 45 year old partner, Michelle Rocca, who is a former Miss Ireland. The couple had their first - a daughter called Aibhe Rocca Morrison in 2006." is in itself enough to verify all of the material listed in the article except the less important part of the year they met - which is referenced in the biographical books cited.Agadant (talk) 02:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm saying there doesn't seem to be any non-tabloidy sources for it. McNeilly via Vi via Shana via ?. -- Jeandré, 2008-04-16t18:22z
The Belfast Telegraph is not a tabloid newspaper. The original subject was whether or not the personal information violates Van Morrison's privacy - which would imply that information here was not widespread and available elsewhere. That point has been shown to not be true and in the process the information presented is verified by as many reliable sources as you will find on most any article in Wikipedia. User:Agadant|Agadant]] (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Agadant (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
(ec replying to [8]) It may not be a tabloid newspaper overall, but that article is tabloid journalism.
DNA#DNA-binding proteins has better and more sources. -- Jeandré, 2008-04-16t20:27z
I don't know if it's a privacy violation, but there is good reason to question the four sentences per wp:v and wp:blp. -- Jeandré, 2008-04-16t20:27z
Reliable sources gives mainstream newspapers as appropriate. I'm sorry but this whole conversation is confusing to me..You asked for a non-tabloidy source and when provided it is said to be tabloidy and if quotations from a named reporter and the subject's own mother in the hometown newspaper are considered gossipy, I just don't know what to say. Mrs. Morrison would I'm very sure have objected publicly if misquoted (and certainly her son would have) and no such thing has happened. Agadant (talk) 21:03, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
See [9] for more info. --NeilN talk ♦ contribs 05:33, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.