Talk:Van Asch College
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Van Asch College is part of WikiProject New Zealand, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-Importance within Schools. | |
 |
This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deafness and Deaf culture.
For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating. |
|
Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
[edit] March 2007
Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and I'm reviewing this page, I'm currently giving it a grade of Stub on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Med on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: Need more information on the school, programs offered, demographics, etc... Could also use pictures and sourced information Adam McCormick 05:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] deaf versus Deaf
I have added a section on Deaf staff. Please note that I have used "deaf" to describe the staff members as my reference is the van Asch page on history, which uses deaf with a small "d". I see no reason to correct this to "Deaf" as I would presume if the teching staff in question were unhappy at being called "deaf" they'd have had this corrected in their individual entries on the van Asch page. The auxiliary staff I mention would have been pre the big "D" movement (I believe this is fairly recent?), so I don't see a reason to identify them as Deaf.
Anyone disagree with my rationale? Justinep 14:57, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
