Talk:Vampire Knight
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Deleted articles
Why did the person delete Yuki Cross's article and leave Zero's and Kaname's --70.23.125.112 (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Leo11--70.23.125.112 (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image Proposal
I found this image on commons, consider to add it in the article. thumb|250px|left|Demographic distribution of society of vampire. Level E is basement of pyramid.
- No, its WP:OR. Collectonian (talk) 18:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Main Page
I propose a deletion of the characters-seiyu for both the drama cd and anime, and put it on the Characters of Vampire Knight page beside the character names. You don't need to repeat a list of voice actors twice on the first page! Most other anime pages have it this way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.151.91 (talk) 03:59, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
I concur......--Monstez 04:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monstez (talk • contribs)
[edit] Hypocrisy regarding external links
Why was the link to anime-planet.com removed as advertising/spam, while the link to anime news network (a virtually identical site) was left in place? If one is considered spam/advertising, then both should be. If one is considered acceptable, then both should be. Both sites are large, established sites that are very similar in nature (although each has unique content that the other does not). Not only that, but anime-planet is currently voted higher than anime news network on many sites: http://www.activeanime.com/html/content/view/2628/36/ for example. In summary, how can one large, established site, which provides useful & valid information on the subject at hand be considered spam, while another very similar site is allowed to remain? Not only is the anime news network link allowed to remain in this article, but it is allowed to remain in virtually every anime article. Cypherswipe (talk) 15:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- ANN is considered an acceptable, reliable source and meets the Wikipedia external link guidelines. Popularity is not a consideration, and anime-planet is not a notable site at all, nor is it similar to ANN. Its a blog with a non-useful database of recommendations and doesn't meet the linking guidelines. It has nothing to offer at all.Collectonian (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'd hardly call ANN and A-P very similiar. As nice as the goods that A-P provides, I don't see anything regarding news on anime companies, license acquirings, coverage of upcoming series or current series relative to how they are doing on the mainstream, etc...basically A-P offers nothing else but summaries, recommendations for other anime series, and a place for anime fans to hang out. In terms of ANN, we can atleast use the information and cite it. Fox816 (talk) 22:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] SPOILERS
I just want to say that you have a GIANT spoiler in this article! This is suposed to be a informative page, to people who hasn't seen this yet, I came here to reed about this, and I left this page Knowing they're Brothers.... come on!!! This is REALLY REALLY BAD!!! You should be more carefull... You just ruined all my excpectations about this anime!!!!A few minutes ago I was with all expectatins and now i fell ... c'om on!!!
Please put a spoilers wanrning bar in that sentence!!! SAVE THE PEOPLE WHO HASNT'T READ THAT YET PLEASE!!!!!
