Talk:Vampire Counts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Knight chess piece This article is within the scope of WikiProject Strategy games, an effort by several users to improve Wikipedia articles on strategy games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] General Issues

1) Luthor Harkon IS a Von Carstein Vampire Count, this is viewable in rules available on an english language GW website (cannot remember which) and there is a main page for the Blood Dragons.

2) the History of the Vampire's of Lahamia are incorrect. They were created by Nagash's Elixiar of Blood, which he had been using to prolong his own life. After Nagash was overthrown by the other Priest-kings, the rulers of the city state of Lahamia took Nagash's Elixiar in secret. It was the use of this that caused the vampire's to be born. Their history goes on from there. (95kingc 12:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC))

Well, someone (W'Soran) improved the drink in subtle ways, thus making them Vampires - otherwise Nagash would be one as well UltimateNagash 08:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Online Vampire Communities?

This section is obviously just an ad for the site linked within. The site is neither a particularly well-known site or a useful repository of info, so I'm going to go ahead and suggest deletion of the entire section if no one objects. Jdodger 06:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't object - maybe ones like the Blood Keep should be linked instead (I believe they're much more well known) UltimateNagash 08:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Deleted - forums generally don't count as suitable to link to. GraemeLeggett 09:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Jdodger & GraemL. I've got a question for you there, have you checked the External Links @ Warhammer? there are also forums located...
And @ UltimateNagash; You believe they're much more well known, purely subjective decision if you ask me...
Anywayz, plain stupid if you ask me..... or should it just be named as an External Links thread? --ArcumWTE 11:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)