Talk:Vampire (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on November 28, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.
This Buffyverse-related article is part of WikiProject Buffyverse, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Buffy, Angel & the rest of the Buffyverse. You can help! Visit the project page, episode checklist or discuss an article at the project talk-page.
Buffy Portal

Pending tasks for :Vampire (Buffy the Vampire Slayer):

 edit - history - watch - purge
  • Add fitting images to ilustrate sections
This to-do list was added by WikiProject Buffyverse. This template adds pages to Category:To do, Buffyverse. Please do not use this for stubs: use {{Buffyverse-stub}} instead.
Archive
Archives
  1. 2006-present

Contents

[edit] Buffy Wiki

I've created an in-depth article on vampires in Buffy Wiki, feel free to extract information from it.--Gonzalo84 00:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Lots of references here that I don't recognize, though I've seen all of both series. I'm guessing that you don't really mean to link to Doug Sanders the golfer. —Tamfang 03:53, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
or to a magazine called The Judge. —Tamfang 19:07, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
or to Caligula's sister Drusilla. —Tamfang 19:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
Indeed. This information needs to be sourced or (not to sound insensitive) it will get the old nip/tuck. In addition, information from non-Joss material (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Buffy/Canon) ought to be sectioned off lower in the article. - Che Nuevara: Join the Revolution 17:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] references needed

There's little point in listing "James and Lisbeth" or "the Roman vampires who rescue Angelus" without at least some reference to the relevant stories. —Tamfang 04:46, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Everything I have written in the article comes from the shows. If you don't know where some information comes from send me a message.--Gonzalo84 14:58, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Every character and every incident mentioned ought to have a link: if the character is too minor to have an entry, link to the episode. The typical reader cannot be expected to remember every incident. —Tamfang 07:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
But I guess you'd rather have me ask you for a reference to each and every item you write. Okay, here goes.
  • In what episodes did these characters appear?
  • Penn
  • Punk vampires (linked to Bachelor Party but that page is no help)
  • Knox the skinhead vampire
  • Whip (name should be added to Into the Woods)
  • James and Elisabeth (listed twice?)
  • Carl and rebel vampires (name should be added to All the Way)
  • Cult of Ul'thar
  • Karl and Paco
  • Russell Winters
  • Dodd McAlvy
  • Boone
  • Dick the Pimp
  • Allen Lloyd
  • When did Angel first visit Merl?
  • When did Spike visit Doc?
  • When was Angel poisoned with
    • "a neural paralytic substance"?
    • Calythia?
  • When did Angel visit Jasmine's zealots' homeworld?
  • When did Gunn visit W&H's suburban hell?
  • When did Buffy and Angel share dreams?
  • When were Spike's legs broken – What's My Line, Part Two or in the old days? (I don't remember that his injury in WML was explicitly described.)
—Tamfang 01:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
— a few items checked off, Tamfang 19:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • When did Angel rescue Kate from an overdose?
—Tamfang 23:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
— a few more items checked off, Tamfang 18:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
—checked off neural paralytic poison --Jwwalker 01:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
—checked off Calynthia powder --Jwwalker 03:43, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
—checked off Jasmine's old world --Jwwalker 04:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] humanity or not humanity

I removed this paragraph:

The Judge himself is another proof of the vampire's "humanity", for which he feels nothing but revolting. He's disgusted by Spike and Dru's affection and Dalton's love for knowledge. Yet he considers Angelus "pure" (but this is not from his absolute lack of humanity, but for his absolute lack of concern/affection towards others)

The Judge's statement "there is no humanity in him (Angel)" contradicts the thesis of this section that a vampire takes much of its personality from its human predecessor; to make it even compatible with that thesis (which is supported by pretty much everything else in the series) it must be twisted, as in the parenthesis, into irrelevance. (If the passage is restored, it ought to link to Innocence, not to The Judge (a magazine).) —Tamfang 19:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

By the way, when did Darla say "what we were informs what we become"? I heard it too, but can't track it down. —Tamfang 19:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

The Prodigal--65.34.221.203 05:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] vampiric charisma

So you can read Cordelia's mind, or what? Given that several times we've seen vampires hypnotize humans, why explicitly reject the notion that there's some unnatural charisma mojo goin' on? If you don't buy it why not simply cut it? —Tamfang 05:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] facial wrists??

Is that an attempt at spelling rictus, or a mistranslation, or what? —Tamfang 06:43, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Psychic abilities

"Angel sends his love." I don't think this is a real demonstration of psychic. As I interpreted while watching Phases, she just had the message before she died. After all, she knew from a previous conversation that Angelus knew Buffy decently well. Any other opinions? Ekarderif 16:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Andrew Vorba and Psychic Link

Re: "Andrew Vorba (Never Kill a Boy on the First Date) speaks of a "he" that told him to attack the Scoobies and fight Buffy. This "he" could be the Aurelian vampire that sired him, or a figment of his imagination." I thought it was clear that the "he" being referred to was God. Vorba as a human was a hellfire-and-brimstone Christian, and when he felt the vampire blood lust, he probably figured that God wanted him to kill. --Jwwalker 06:34, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

By the way, did Vorba's tattoos include any crosses? —Tamfang 21:09, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] nicotine

What's the evidence that Spike is "not affected" by tobacco smoke? And then why does he buy the stuff? —Tamfang 04:45, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Off the top of my head, he does not show any of the negative side effects assosiated with long term smoking, nor has he been shown to suffer withdrawl symptoms. Of course, that's just off the top of my head. - Majin Gojira 14:02, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
But we've never seen him try to quit, so how do we know he has no withdrawal symptoms? And vampires are undead, so how do we know his lungs aren't charred and he simply functions with charred lungs? ````
At the very least, Spike takes no issue with Faith saying "The big C not a problem" (meaning cancer), but mentions that his teeth might turn yellow after many years. (That's late season 7, just after she joins the gang.) I don't know about the cravings or withdrawal bit, but I think the lack of negative effects (loss of breath, etc.) would be natural to a vampire who (a) doesn't need to breathe and (b) doesn't suffer from deadly poisons...unless I'm misunderstanding the mythos at play. Kilyle 11:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] showy Gypsy stuff

When Spike calls Dracula's tricks "showy Gypsy stuff", is he saying that they're not natural vampire powers (whatever that means), or that they're too frivolous for a serious vampire to bother with? —Tamfang 03:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Definitely the first statement and probably the later as well--he was insulting Dracula at the time, but only the first statement can be held as being accurate given the evidence. --Majin Gojira 10:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I think that his statement tells us that vampires can use smoke-and-mirror magic tricks in addition to their own vampire powers, but that many vampires (especially Spike, with his particular love of direct combat) look down on those who rely so heavily on dramatics. Tambourineman 16:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Or that only a vampire as theatrical as Dracula would bother learning them?

What about his power that allows him to return even after being staked? That would be tremendously useful. Voicingmaster 20:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Time before rebirth

It seems to me that we should note that the time interval between death and rebirth as a vampire is depicted in a completely inconsistent manner. On the one hand, we seem to have examples where only a few hours pass. On the other hand, Buffy is always patrolling the graveyards for new graves, from which vampires periodically erupt. Such newly born vampires must have been dead for several days, since it usually takes a few days before one has a funeral and is buried. I don't think we should try to rationalize this, just to say that it's been ill-defined by the show. john k 18:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

The latest edit to that section says The new vampire "rises" after the human has died between nightime hours as shown in Angel when Darla was turned. What does this mean? —Tamfang 00:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Well, nightime has been corrected to nighttime, but I still don't know what "between nighttime hours" means. —Tamfang 07:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm guessing by "between nighttime hours" they mean the person was sired at night. Basically, here's my interpretation. If a guy gets sired at night, he will rise in a couple hours on that same night. However, if he somehow gets sired during the day, then he rises at a much later time, as in some different night. Or maybe the next night, and the guy just had a very speedy funeral.

[edit] Invitations

There is a contradiction in the Invitations section. Dorm rooms are listed as a type of "temporary accommodations" that vampires can enter uninvited. The very next bullet point indicates that vampires do need invitations to enter dorm rooms. Both statements cite the same two episodes. UncreativeNameMaker 07:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

I think this just hasn't been worded properly. I think to go into the dorm building the vamps don't need an invite as it's essentially a public place, but to enter the room where someone actually lives then they would need an invite. Maybe it just need to be clarified, by someone who can watch the relevant episode.--NeilEvans 11:26, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
So how did Sunday's gang get into dorm rooms in "The Freshman"? They had a practice of stealing their victims' stuff and leaving notes for surviving roommates to find. Buffy's roomie was not human, but Buffy herself was alive when they stole her umbrella. —Tamfang 08:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Troublesome cases--- It says that Joyce's invitation to Darla wasn't really sufficent, but joyce does basically say come in, and her sentence was alot longer, i guess doesn't really imply that you are inviting someone in.

I just noticed another "troublesome cases" candidate: Spike enters The Trio's basement without an invite in Smashed. They had apparently never met before at this point, so I don't think I missed an invite in a previous episode. It's the basement of Warren's mother's house, so it doesn't seem like a grey area, just a flat-out mistake. Nasarius 05:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Spike met Warren at the end of "I Was Made to Love You", when he commissioned the Buffybot. Presumably Warren's mom invited him in. Good catch, though, I never thought to ask how he got into the basement! —Tamfang 07:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
An alternative hypothesis: the basement, and the house to which it belonged, were not in current use as a residence. Wasn't it destroyed when Buffy tripped the booby-traps? Mrs Mears might object to that! —Tamfang 07:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
There are some anachronisms in the concept of being invited in; Angel mentions in Buffy that just uttering the words "come in" is enough, but when "you can't" is added to them as a prefix, they don't work their magic. Plus, there is the occasion when Cordelia says "Angel is totally invited to come over", which removes the problem (which may be due to the actual, DEAD, owners of that home are still in there)... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.122.120.244 (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vampire Psychology

The article discusses Anne Pratt (Spike's mum), saying that she is an example of a vampire who was too inhibited to say that Spike was too attached to her in life, but was free to say them once she had no soul. I had a different interpretation, so I rewatched Lies My Parents Told Me. It seems that Spike's original interpretation of events was (as the article says) that she was finally saying what she had always felt, and that is why the event was so deeply traumatic to him. But at the end, when Spike has dealt with his mother issues and diffused his hypnotic trigger, it seems that he has come to a different conclusion - that his mother loved him dearly, and that it was just the demon talking and not her. This indicates to me that she was an example of a vampire trying (as Angelus did when he lost his soul in Buffy Season 2) to stamp out all the good, loving elements of humanity from her human life, contradicting what this article now says. So, I think that Anne Pratt should be catagorized as a vampire who was the corrupt opposite of her human self instead. What do others think? Tambourineman 16:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I think it's still open to interpretaion. It could be that his mother did have some slight feeling of being smothered by William's love and the vampire now living in her body twisted it to such an extent to what we see in the episode. We know that some vestiges of the human personality of left over after siring, but that the demon twist, and degrades any vestige of humanity.--NeilEvans 16:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Drowning Torture

Two pieces within the article speak of the vampire not needing to breathe, yet possibly retaining the reflex. How does Spike's drowning torture fit into this?

When was that? —Tamfang 05:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Physically, he struggles to escape, then goes limp or passes out; a moment after returning to air, he spits out water (clears his lungs), then starts to breathe deeply (pant?) and seems weakened. The easiest interpretation of this is that he was struggling for breath, that taking water into his lungs knocked him out (briefly), and that upon returning to air he had to refill his body's oxygen supply. Unless this is a total flub on the part of the writers, how can it be accounted for? Two questions here:

Question One: If a vampire doesn't need to breathe, how can drowning be torture (of the type shown, which is denying breath), and why does Spike pant to regain oxygen? (Is it merely that Spike, in over a century, never learned how to do without breath for a while?)

Question Two: Is a vampire whose lungs are filled with fluid conscious? in pain? capable of activity? I would imagine painful, but I doubt it knocks them out...isn't Angel conscious while he's under the ocean? If the vampire is still conscious and still capable of movement, why does Spike struggle and then go limp? If he goes limp consciously, to reduce the torture, then why did he struggle at all, the first or at least the second time? It doesn't seem like he's playing his captors. Anyway, would like to see some accounting of this put on the page--thanks. Kilyle 12:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I think the simple answer is that it's almost certainly a writing screw-up. Putting aside that meta explanation and coming up with an in-story reason is going to cause us some problems, since we're not allowed to speculate. We might be able to come up with any number of plausible guesses, but Wikipedia can't. If it warrants a mention then it'll have to be something purely factual, describing what happened with no attempt to add any explanatory interpretation.--Nalvage 13:33, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, I don't know, either. Maybe because of his soul? Besides, Angel has one, and I think he wasn't conscious.Pokemon Buffy Titan 05:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Another case where Spike's breathing is (at least arguably) handled wrong is late in season 4: he comes to Giles's door, stops, hyperventilates a bit, knocks and announces, panting for verisimilitude, that the soldier-boys (or someone else?) are after him. —Tamfang 05:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Absolute invulrability

"In either case, the vampire is immune to the effects of sunlight and instantly regenerates wounds, such as those caused by staking or even an attempted beheading: the flesh heals immediately behind the passing blade."

I don't think a vampire could survive a beheading. We've seen that invulrability protects from sunlight, and heals wounds such as stabs to the heart, but what evidence have we seen that suggests that the flesh would heal as the blade passes? In Spike: Old Wounds, Spike encounters a vampire who is wearing another gem of Amara. He cuts off the vampire's hand and destroys the ring. Now, if a vampire's neck is protected, surely his wrist should be as well? Furthermore, in "Tales of the Vampires", a vampire gets a heart transplant opperation so that he can enjoy the sunlight. The scientist says to him "Now, don't go getting your head cut off. It's a heart not a neckbrace." I've rewatched the gem of Amara episodes, and while they talk about how a vampire wearing the ring can survive stakes, sunlight and fire, they conveniently avoid the subject of decapitation. For these reasons, I believe that decapitation would kill an otherwise invulnrable vampire. The quote "It's a heart, not a necbrace", and the way the scientist warns against decapitation really jumps out at me. The comic is considered canon, and if it applies to the heart transplants, it's a logical conclusion that the same would apply with the gem of Amara.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.54.64 (talk • contribs)

I'm thinking that you're right. Only, even if the vamp is wearing the gem, the beheading would still work and ta-dah! Dust. So why is the vamp wearing a gem called unkillable? Pokemon Buffy Titan 05:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sire

I was cleaning up a marked disambiguation page for Sire per Wikipedia:Disambiguation, and there was a link to this article. The vampire term "sire" and "to sire" are not decribed at wikipedia or wiktionary so far (unless I missed something) but its gets mentioned very prominently in this article here (I have never heard the term though), so I'd encourage anyone to either start that article (Sire (vampire)) or have a look at the disambiguation page and help out. – sgeureka t•c 21:15, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

The only time anyone will ever want to know what sire (vampire) means is when they're reading this page, or something that ought to link here. So sire should be defined here; it does not need a page of its own. —Tamfang 06:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Invitation?

Couldn't a welcome mat be considered an invitation?

[edit] Darla's infection

The disease appears to remain in the vampire's body, given that Darla was afflicted with syphilis again after being resurrected as a human, however it is no longer transmissible. Otherwise, syphilis would have passed from Darla to Angelus and from Angel to Buffy Summers.

I removed this because there is another explanation. W&H resurrected Darla as she was when alive, complete with infection and soul. This does not mean that vampire Darla retained the infection, any more than she retained a human soul. —Tamfang 05:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Similarly: Female vampires have ovulation, though sterile as well (except again that one time). Where's the evidence for ovulation (except that one time)?! Do vampires menstruate? —Tamfang 06:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] cures for vampirism

I removed most of the new section "Becoming Human". Darla's resurrection was a possibly unique use of major magic, from which we can't necessarily extrapolate anything. This bit —

There is a suggestion that in the grand scheme of things a vampire becoming human is not at all uncommon - note the question a Wolfram and Hart employee asks of somebody which appears to be de rigour:
“ Are you now or have you ever been a vampire? ”

— sounds like a casual joke to me, and it's not in the script that I downloaded from, er, somewhere or other. (Misspelled rigueur, by the way.) —Tamfang 05:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

I once heard it said that Angel would not have survived his encounter with the Mohra in I Will Remember You if not for his human soul, because a vampire cannot inhabit a living body. (Perhaps a normal vampire would become some kind of zombie.) Dunno if there's any canonical basis for this opinion. —Tamfang 05:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments from Eight Sequential Albums As the guy who wrote it I'd just like to clarify a few points:

Firstly I included the example of Darla because it shows that it is possible; I was attempting to be through and include the different approaches to it. First time editing an article after all.

Secondly, of course the comment is meant to be humorous and isn't the sort of thing writers include in the script (although if it was it wouldn't surprise me if it wasn't included in the transcript you downloaded); but it was deliberately placed in the episode and so whatever its intent it's in there as a fact of the Buffyverse. Plus with branches in many alternate dimensions and magicks and happenings it is definitely possible. But I understand your point.

Finally didn't Billy in "I've Got You Under My Skin" lack a soul even when he was human? So surely it should be possible for anything without a soul to be able to inhabit his body (just as the demon that possessed Billy did), and thus any body? Eight Sequential Albums 20:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Interesting point about Billy; see also "Living Conditions", where Kathy sucked out most(?) of Buffy's soul and merely made her bitchy. —Tamfang 07:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Vamp-face increases strength?

Vampires in this form are even stronger than they are in "human" form.

Any source for this? I don't remember noticing a difference in strength between vamp and non-vamp face when they're fighting.--The Scourge 01:08, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

It's a bit of opinion that keeps being removed and then just gets added again, as far as I know no compelling evidence has cropped up. --Nalvage 13:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
On at least one occasion, when Buffy and Angel were about to attack a lair of badguys, Buffy said "Better put on your game face." Not compelling but at least suggestive. —Tamfang 20:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fixed Errors

Fixed three problems in this page.

1. Spike is not intellectual. When alive, William is pseudo-intellectual, as evidenced by the mention of his bad poetry. As Spike, his relative stupidity (and lack of foresight) are constantly shown i.e. his flawed plan to separate Buffy from her friends.
The article erroneously says: "Curiously, Spike and Drusilla do not drink from the three slayers they killed"
2. Spike actually did drink (more accurately, taste) blood from the Boxer rebellion slayer.
3. Drusilla wasn't involved in the deaths of the Boxer or 70's NYC slayers.
One thing I didn't correct, but should be is the definition of vampires as being dead. This is followed by a definition of death, then says they're actually undead. Given the way-too-massive size of this article, this would be better condensed as simply stating that vampires are undead, as that's pretty much what they've always been defined as. 97.82.247.200 19:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
And Spike wasn't involved in killing Kendra. I wrote "the three Slayers they killed" because between them they killed three Slayers. —Tamfang 07:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:S203 Spike.jpg

Image:S203 Spike.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] indirect sunlight

I don't think this is right:

Filtered or indirect sunlight does not cause injury to vampires. If protected from direct sunlight, vampires can be active in the middle of the day.

Riley once pushed Spike out the door of Buffy's house – onto the covered porch, not into direct sunlight – and Spike said "Let me in, I'm already starting to sizzle!" On another occasion, unless I dreamt it, Spike (or another vampire) said something to suggest that to be outdoors even in the shade is painful unless the sun is low in the sky. — In a separate issue, "filtered" is too broad: does it include polarization? Colored glass? —Tamfang 08:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Well, during the entirety of Angel, Angel is shown walking through the office, which is basically covered with sunlight, although the blinds are halfway down. Spike, precisely in the episode "In the Dark", and in some Buffy episodes, is shown in the shade, in mid-day. My guess is, while indirect (such as through a regular window) sunlight MAY induce some pain, it doesn't necessarily harm the vampire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.122.120.244 (talk) 19:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:S203 Spike.jpg

Image:S203 Spike.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Vamp Dusted.JPG

Image:Vamp Dusted.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Archive closed talk items please

Could someone familiar with the article please archive talk items that are now closed (resolved)? This makes it easier for new folks to read what's relevant and takes up less loading time for users with slower computer connections. Benjiboi 05:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image improvement

the current images should be sent to the wikipedia Image lab for improvement - they seem way too dark to be terribly helpful. Benjiboi 21:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit]  ???

What happened to this article? It used to be much longer and more detailed with sections on the vampire's weakness etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vampire in Rug (talk • contribs) 11:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

It was recently nominated for deletion, because it was written from the perspective that vampire's were real, which is against policy. To save the article, we had to delete the cruft and add some real world context. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampire (Buffyverse) for more info.  Paul  730 11:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Much of the removed material was incoherent lists of examples that we're well rid of. —Tamfang (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Much of the information was already on the Vampire page, such as weaknesses, strengths and abilities. There would therefore be no need for it to also appear on this page --Maurice45 (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Redirect

I have redirected this page as it not only deals with Buffy the Vampire Slayer, but with Angel and Fray as well. --Maurice45 (talk) 18:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but they originated in BtVS. It was decided "Buffyverse" wasn't an appropiate term on Wikipedia because it's fan slang.  Paul  730 20:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I've reverted your edits for the reasons stated above. Also, you didn't move the page properly, you just copied the info to the redirect page. I'd also like to apologise for clicking the minor edit box when reverting you though, it was a slip of the finger, I know reverting isn't minor.  Paul  730 23:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)