User talk:Valeria.depaiva

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Valeria.depaiva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Cronholm144 03:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Looking at your contribs, you might want to consider joining WP:WPM. Cheers--Cronholm144 03:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Thanks For The Welcome!--Cronholm144 and a question?

Thanks for the welcome, very sweet. I find it difficult to uncover wikipedia conventions and usages. So a question: I created my account as I found it annoying that one could read in wikipedia about a William Craig (politician) and a William Craig (theologian) but not about the logician, even if his Interpolation Theorem was all over the logic pages. So I created a page for Bill Craig, but I worry that he might prefer to be called a philosopher, not a logician. Is there a way of having him be just William Craig Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, etc, without calling him William Craig (logician)?Valeria.depaiva 06:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Not really, you will have to pick one or the other, This usually wouldn't be a problem, but since William Craig is such a common name, disambiguation is required. If you know his middle name I could make the necessary adjustments to avoid the logic vs. philosophy characterization.--Cronholm144 15:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks -Valeria.depaiva 16:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC). I think I may have his middle name in a CV sitting somewhere in the office. meanwhile could you please get the umlauts in Gödel's name to work for me? I did find the reference card, but the font is too small and either my pdf reader is too old or my new add-on from firefox for pdfs is screwing things up, I cannot read the reference card properly.

[edit] Ronald Kaplan

Hmm... I think, most of what I disliked about the article has now been changed (I also wikified it to some extend). Looking at it now, it seems to be a short but informative article. I can't say anything about Kaplan's notability, though, as I don't know him. And to be honest, I currently don't really see where he might be "important" enought to deserve an article. If he gets put up for deletion, I would neither vote for nor against him. — N-true 18:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Natural deduction

Hi. I think that you're Italian. Sei sicura di quello che hai scritto nella voce dell'intestazione? Are you shore of the text that you written in the section's title? Grazie, MOJSKA 666 (msg) 14:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the answer. All good. Bye, MOJSKA 666 (msg) 15:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of William w tait

I have nominated William w tait, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William w tait. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Roleplayer (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2008 (UTC)