Utricularia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Bladderwort | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Utricularia vulgaris,
the common bladderwort |
||||||||||||
| Scientific classification | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| Diversity | ||||||||||||
| 215 species | ||||||||||||
 Bladderwort distribution
|
||||||||||||
| Subgenera | ||||||||||||
Bladderwort is the common name given to the plants of the genus Utricularia. The largest genus of carnivorous plants, it consists of some 215 species[1] which occur in fresh water and wet soil across every continent except Antarctica. Bladderworts are cultivated for their flowers which are often compared with those of snapdragons and orchids.
All bladderworts are carnivorous, and capture small organisms by means of bladder-like traps. Terrestrial species tend to have tiny traps, and feed on minute prey such as protozoa and rotifers swimming in water-saturated soil. However, in aquatic species such as the Common Bladderwort U. vulgaris, the bladders are large (sometimes exceeding 5 mm in diameter[citation needed]) and can feed on more substantial prey such as water fleas (Daphnia), nematodes and even fish fry, mosquito larvae and young tadpoles. Despite their small size, the traps are extremely sophisticated. When prey animals brush against trigger hairs connected to the trapdoor, it is released and the bladder sucks in the door and the prey, along with the water surrounding it. Once the bladder is full of water, the door closes again, the whole process taking only ten to fifteen thousandths of a second[citation needed].
Bladderworts are unusual and highly specialized plants, and the vegetative organs are not clearly separated into roots, leaves and stems as in most other angiosperms.[2] The bladder traps, conversely, are recognized as one of the most sophisticated structures in the plant kingdom.
Contents |
[edit] Physical description
The main part of a bladderwort plant always lies below the surface of its substrate. Terrestrial species sometimes produce a few photosynthetic leaf-shoots which lie unobtrusively flat against the surface of their soil, but in all species only the flowering stems rise above and are prominent. This means that the terrestrial species are generally visible only while they are in flower, although aquatic species can be observed below the surfaces of ponds and streams.
[edit] Plant structure
Most species form long, thin, sometimes branching stems or stolons beneath the surface of their substrate, whether that be pond water or dripping moss in the canopy of a tropical rainforest. To these stolons are attached both the bladder traps and photosynthetic leaf-shoots, and in terrestrial species the shoots are thrust upward through the soil into the air or along the surface.
The name bladderwort refers to the bladder-like traps. The generic name Utricularia is similarly derived from the Latin utriculus, a word which has many related meanings but which most commonly means wine flask or leather bottle. The aquatic members of the genus have the largest and most obvious bladders, and these were initially thought to be flotation devices before their carnivorous nature was discovered.
[edit] Flowers and reproduction
Flowers are the only part of the plant clear of the underlying soil or water. They are usually produced at the end of thin, often vertical stems. They can range in size from a few millimetres across to two inches or more[citation needed], and have two asymmetric labiate (unequal, lip-like) petals, the lower usually significantly larger than the upper. They can be of any colour, or of many colours, and are similar in structure to the flowers of a related carnivorous genus, Pinguicula.
The flowers of aquatic varieties like U. vulgaris are often described as similar to small yellow snapdragons, and the Australian species U. dichotoma can produce the effect of a field full of violets on nodding stems. The epiphytic species of South America, however, are generally considered to have the showiest, as well as the largest, flowers. It is these species that are frequently compared with orchids.
Certain plants in particular seasons might produce closed, self-pollinating (cleistogamous) flowers; but the same plant or species might produce open, insect-pollinated flowers elsewhere or at a different time of year, and with no obvious pattern. Sometimes, individual plants have both types of flower at the same time: aquatic species such as U. dimorphantha and U. geminiscapa, for example, usually have open flowers riding clear of the water and one or more closed, self-pollinating flowers beneath the water (1). Seeds are numerous and small, sometimes as small as 0.2 mm[citation needed].
[edit] Distribution and habitat
Utricularia can survive almost anywhere where there is fresh water for at least part of the year: only Antarctica and the oceanic islands have no native species. The greatest species diversity for the genus is seen in South America, with Australia coming a close second.[1] In common with most carnivorous plants, they grow in moist soils which are poor in dissolved minerals, where their carnivorous nature gives them a competitive advantage; terrestrial varieties of Utricularia can frequently be found alongside representatives of the carnivorous genera Sarracenia (pitcher plants), Drosera (sundews) and others in very wet areas where continuously moving water removes most soluble minerals from the soil.
About 80% of the species are terrestrial[citation needed], and most inhabit waterlogged or wet soils, where their tiny bladders can be permanently exposed to water in the substrate. Frequently they will be found in marshy areas where the water table is very close to the surface. Most of the terrestrial species are tropical, although they occur worldwide.
Approximately 15% of the species are aquatic[citation needed]. Most of these drift freely over the surface of ponds and other still, muddy-bottomed waters and only protrude above the surface when flowering, although a few species are adapted to rapidly moving streams or even waterfalls (2). The plants are usually found in acidic waters, but they are quite capable of growing in alkaline waters and would very likely do so were it not for the higher level of competition from other plants in such areas (3). The Common Bladderwort U. vulgaris is an aquatic, and grows into branching rafts with individual stems up to three metres[citation needed] long in ponds and ditches throughout Eurasia.
Some South American tropical species are epiphytes, and can be found growing in wet moss and spongy bark on trees in rainforests, or even in the watery leaf-rosettes of other epiphytes such as various Tillandsia (a type of Bromeliad, or air plant) species (4). Rossette-living epiphytes such as U. nelumbifolia put out runners, looking for other nearby bromeliads to colonise. (5)
The plants are as highly adapted in their methods of surviving seasonally inclement conditions as they are in their structure and feeding habits. Temperate perennials can require a winter period in which they die back each year, and they will weaken in cultivation if they are not given it; tropical and warm-temperate species, on the other hand, require no dormancy. Floating bladderworts in cold temperate zones such as the UK and Siberia can produce winter buds called turions at the extremities of their stems: as the autumnal light fails and growth slows down, the main plant may rot away or be killed by freezing conditions, but the turions will separate and sink to the bottom of the pond to rest beneath the coming ice until the spring, when they will return to the surface and resume growth. Many Australian species will grow only during the wet season, reducing themselves to tubers only 10 mm long to wait out the dry season[citation needed]. Other species are annual, returning from seed each year.
[edit] Trapping mechanism
.svg/180px-Utricularia_traps_(sketch).svg.png)
[edit] Physical description of the trap
Authorities agree that the vacuum-driven bladders of Utricularia are the most sophisticated carnivorous trapping mechanism to be found anywhere in the plant kingdom (6). The bladders are usually shaped similarly to broad beans and are to be found attached to the submerged stolons by slender stalks.
The bladder walls are very thin and transparent, but are sufficiently inflexible to maintain the bladder's shape despite the vacuum created within. The entrance, or 'mouth', of the trap is a circular or oval flap whose upper half is joined to the body of the trap by very flexible, yielding cells which form an effective hinge. The door rests on a platform formed by the thickening of the bladder wall immediately underneath. A soft but substantial membrane called the velum stretches in a curve around the middle of this platform, and helps seal the door. A second band of springy cells cross the door just above its lower edge, and provide the flexibility for the bottom of the door to become a bendable 'lip' which can make a perfect seal with the velum.
The outer cells of the whole trap excrete mucilage and under the door this is produced in greater quantities and contains sugars. The mucilage certainly contributes towards the seal, and the sugars may help to attract prey.
Terrestrial species generally have tiny traps (sometimes as small as 0.25 mm) with a broad beak-like structure extending and curving down over the entrance; this forms a passageway to the trapdoor and may help prevent the trapping and ingestion of inorganic particles. Aquatic species tend to have larger bladders (up to 10 mm as those of Utricularia hamiltonii), and the mouth of the trap is usually surrounded not by a beak but by branching antennae, which serve both to guide prey animals to the trap entrance and to fend the trap mouth away from larger bodies which might trigger the mechanism needlessly (see diagram, left). Epiphytic species have unbranching antennae which curve in front of the mouth and probably serve the same purpose, although it has been observed that they are also capable of holding a pocket of water in front of the mouth by capillary action, and that this assists with the trapping action (7).
[edit] Trapping mechanism
The trapping mechanism of Utricularia is purely mechanical: no reaction from the plant (irritability) is required in the presence of prey, in contrast with the triggered mechanisms employed by Venus Flytraps (Dionaea), waterwheels (Aldrovanda), and many sundews (Drosera). The only active mechanism involved is the constant pumping out of water through the bladder walls by active transport.
As water is pumped out, the bladder's walls are sucked inwards by the vacuum created, and any dissolved material inside the bladder will become more concentrated. The sides of the bladder bend inwards, storing potential energy like a spring. Eventually, no more water can be extracted, and the bladder trap is 'fully set' (technically, osmotic pressure rather than physical pressure is the limiting factor).
Extending outwards from the bottom of the trapdoor are several long bristle-stiff protuberances that are sometimes referred to as trigger hairs but which have no similarity to the sensitive triggers found in Dionaea and Aldrovanda. In fact, these bristles are simply levers. The suction force exerted by the primed bladder on the door is resisted by the adhesion of its flexible bottom against the soft-sealing velum. The equilibrium depends quite literally on a hair trigger, and the slightest touch to one of the lever hairs will deform the flexible door lip enough to create a tiny gap, breaking the seal.
Once the seal is disturbed, the bladder walls instantly spring back to a more rounded shape; the door flies open and a column of water is sucked into the bladder (see figure 2). The animal which touched the lever is inevitably drawn in, and as soon as the trap is filled, the door resumes its closed position—the whole operation being completed in as little as one-hundredth of a second.
Once inside, the prey will be dissolved by digestive secretions. This generally occurs within a few hours, although some protozoa appear to be highly resistant and have been observed to live for several days inside the trap (8). All the time, the trap walls continue to pump out water, and the bladder can be ready for its next capture in as little as fifteen minutes.
[edit] Lloyd's experiments
In the 1940s F.E Lloyd conducted extensive experiments with carnivorous plants, including Utricularia, and settled many points which had previously been the subject of conjecture. He proved that the mechanism of the trap was purely mechanical by both killing the trigger hairs with iodine and subsequently showing that the response was unaffected, and by demonstrating that the trap could be made ready to spring a second (or third) time immediately after being set off if the bladder's excretion of water were helped by a gentle squeeze; in other words, the delay of at least fifteen minutes between trap springings is due solely to the time needed to excrete water, and the triggers need no time to recover irritability (unlike the reactive trigger hairs of Venus Flytraps, for example) (9).
He tested the role of the velum by showing that the trap will never set if small cuts are made to it; and showed that the excretion of water can be continued under all conditions likely to be found in the natural environment, but can be prevented by driving the osmotic pressure in the trap beyond normal limits by the introduction of glycerine (10).
[edit] The ingestion of larger prey
Lloyd devoted several studies to the possibility, often recounted but never previously accounted for under scientific conditions, that Utricularia can consume larger prey such as young tadpoles and mosquito larvae by catching them by the tail, and ingesting them bit by bit (11).
Prior to Lloyd, several authors had reported this phenomenon and had attempted to explain it by positing that creatures caught by the tail repeatedly set off the trap as they thrash about in an attempt to escape—even as their tails are actively digested by the plant. Lloyd, however, demonstrated that the plant is quite capable of ingestion by stages without the need of multiple stimuli.
.gif)
He produced suitable artificial "prey" for his experiments by stirring albumen (egg white) into hot water and selecting shreds of an appropriate length and thickness. When caught by one end, the strand would gradually be drawn in, sometimes in sudden jumps, and at other times by a slow and continuous motion. Strands of albumen would often be fully ingested in as little as twenty minutes.
Mosquito larvae, caught by the tail, would be engulfed bit by bit. A typical example given by Lloyd showed that a larva of a size at the upper limit of what the trap could manage would be ingested stage by stage over the course of about twenty-four hours; but that the head, being rigid, would often prove too large for the mouth of the trap and would remain outside, plugging the door. When this happened, the trap evidently formed an effective seal with the head of the larva as it could still excrete water and become flattened, but it would nevertheless die within about ten days "evidently due to overfeeding".
Softer-bodied prey of the same size such as small tadpoles could be ingested completely, because they have no rigid parts and the head, although capable of plugging the door for a time, will soften and yield and finally be drawn in.
Very thin strands of albumen could be soft and fine enough to allow the trapdoor to close completely; these would not be drawn in any further unless the trigger hairs were indeed stimulated again. On the other hand, a human hair, finer still but relatively hard and unyielding, could prevent a seal being formed; these would prevent the trap from resetting at all due to leakage of water either side.
Lloyd concluded that the sucking action produced by the excretion of water from the bladder was sufficient to draw larger soft-bodied prey into the trap without the need for a second or further touch to the trigger levers. An animal long enough not to be fully engulfed upon first springing the trap, but thin and soft enough to allow the door to return fully to its set position, would indeed be left partly outside the trap until it or another body triggered the mechanism once again. However, the capture of hard bodies not fully drawn into the trap would prevent its further operation.
[edit] Species
- For a list, please see the separate article List of Utricularia species.
Utricularia is the largest genus of carnivorous plants. It is one of the three genera that make up the Bladderwort family (Lentibulariaceae), along with the butterworts (Pinguicula) and corkscrew plants (Genlisea).
This genus was considered to have 250 species until Peter Taylor reduced the number to 214 in his exhaustive study The Genus Utricularia: a taxonomic monograph, published by HMSO (1989). Taylor's classification is now generally accepted.
The genus Polypompholyx, the pink petticoats, contained just two species of carnivorous plant, Polypompholyx tenella and Polypompholyx multifida, previously distinguished from the otherwise similar genus Utricularia by their possession of four calyx lobes rather than two. The genus has now been subsumed into Utricularia.
The genus Biovularia contained the species Biovularia olivacea (also known as B. brasiliensis or B. minima) and Biovularia cymbantha. The genus has been subsumed into Utricularia.
[edit] Phylogenetics
The following cladogram shows the relationship between various subgenera and sections. It summarizes the results of two studies (Jobson et al. 2003; Müller et al. 2004), following Müller et al. 2006 [3]. Since the sections "Aranella" and "Vesiculina" are polyphyletic, they show up multiple times in the cladogram (*). Some monotypic sections have not been included in the study, so that their place in this system is unclear.
┌──── Section Avesicaria ┐
┌─────┤ │
│ └──── Section Vesiculina * │
┌─────┤ │
│ │ ┌──── Utricularia olivacea │
│ └─────┤ │
┌─────┤ └──── Section Vesiculina * │
│ │ │
│ └──────────────── Section Nelipus │Subgenus
┌─────┤ │Utricularia
│ │ ┌──── Section Lecticula │
│ └─────────────────┤ │
┌─────────────────────┤ └──── Section Utricularia │
│ │ │
│ │ ┌──── Section Orchidioides │
│ └───────────────────────┤ │
│ └──── Section Foliosa ┘
│
│ ┌──── Section Oligocista ┐
│ ┌─────┤ │
│ │ └──── Section Avesicarioides │
│ ┌─────┤ │
│ │ └────────── Section Benjaminiana │
┌─────┤ ┌─────┤ │
│ │ │ │ ┌──── Section Stomoisia │
│ │ │ └───────────┤ │
│ │ ┌─────┤ └──── Section Enskide │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ └────────────────────── Section Aranella * │Subgenus
│ │ ┌─────┤ │Bivalvaria
│ │ │ │ ┌──── Section Calpidisca │
│ │ │ └───────────────────────┼──── Section Lloydia │
│ │ ┌─────┤ └──── Section Australes │
│ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ │ ┌──── Section Nigrescentes │
│ └─────────┤ └─────────────────────────────┤ │
│ │ └──── Section Phyllaria │
│ │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────── Section Aranella * ┘
│
│ ┌──── Section Pleiochasia ┐Subgenus
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │Polypompholyx
└──── Section Polypompholyx ┘
[edit] Footnotes
- Taylor p. 39
- c.f. Slack p. 165
- c.f. Slack p. 168: Slack successfully introduced U. vulgaris to alkaline pondwater.
- D'Amato p. 220
- Lloyd p.213
- Slack p.165; Cheers, chapter Utricularia; LLoyd has an extensive discussion of the evidence in chapter XIV The Utricularia Trap and provides schematic diagrams representing the traps' complexity in analogy to an imaginary mousetrap involving 26 separate mechanisms. Also c.f. Taylor (Introduction) and D'Amato pp. 221-222.
- Lloyd, ibid.
- ibid. p. 241
- ibid.
- ibid. p. 251
- ibid. pp. 252-253; c.f. also Slack pp. 222-223 who gives the earlier hypothesis
[edit] References
- Lloyd, F.E., The Carnivorous Plants ch. XIV The Utricularia Trap, Waltham, Mass. 1942 [reprinted Dover Publications, New York 1976]
- Taylor, Peter, The Genus Utricularia: a taxonomic monograph, Her Majesty's Stationary Office, London 1989
- Cheers, G., Carnivorous Plants, Melbourne 1983
- Slack, Adrian, Carnivorous Plants, London 1979
- D'Amato, Peter, The Savage Garden, Berkeley, California 1998
- Darwin, Charles, Insectivorous Plants, New York 1875
- ^ a b Bruce Salmon,"Carnivorous Plants of New Zealand", Ecosphere publications, 2001
- ^ Rutishauser, Rolf; Isler, B.. "Developmental Genetics and Morphological Evolution of Flowering Plants, Especially Bladderworts (Utricularia): Fuzzy Arberian Morphology Complements Classical Morphology". Annals of Botany 88 (1173): 1202.
- ^ K. F. Müller, T. Borsch, L. Legendre, S. Porembski, W. Barthlott: Recent Progress in Understanding the Evolution of Carnivorous Lentibulariaceae (Lamiales), in: Plant Biology, 2006; 8: 748-757
[edit] External links
- Photos of Utricularia
- The International Carnivorous Plant Society
- Utricularia
- Botanical Society of America, Utricularia - the Bladderworts
|
||||||||||||||
