Talk:Uti possidetis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Military science task force

Uti_Possidetis_Juris and Uti_possidetis should be merged. Mathiastck 22:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree, go ahead and merge them. Accounting4Taste 20:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Done Nik42 04:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Please refer to Talk:Uti Possidetis Juris#Merge Proposal --Jor70 15:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Uti possidetis de facto, which refers to effective possession at the end of a conflict and has existed since Roman times, and Uti possidetis juris, which refers to possession based on legal tiltle, are two different legal concepts.

http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol8/No3/art6-03.html

The first time Uti possidetis juris began to have more than a bi-lateral character was at the Congress of Lima in 1848

http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~phensel/Research/iowa06.pdf

Go to section entitled 'Norm Emergence'

I think the article should make reference to both types of uti possidetisDab14763 18:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)