User talk:Utad3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Harold Aspden
Hi, I noticed your link to Harold_Aspden on the vote for deletion page. I had not heard of him amazingly, what an interesting article. Unfortunately, you may have opened a 'can of worms' on that article by linking to it on the deletion page. So lets keep an eye on this article as it might soon be under scrutiny by people intent on discrediting it. Otherwise, thanks for your vote of support! -Ionized 23:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- "The result was delete" per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Aspden. -- Jeff G. 19:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion
[edit] Creation: The Physical Truth (talk)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Creation: The Physical Truth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Creation: The Physical Truth. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. ScienceApologist 23:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively cross-posting in order to influence Creation: The Physical Truth. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "[t]he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Wikipedia's common practice"1, such cross-posting should adhere to specific guidelines found in Wikipedia:Spam. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking2. It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you.. Asteriontalk 02:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- I have seen now your message, I was not aware that it was not allowed; I apologize and thank you for you warning. I was trying to alert Administrators to abusive tagging by Wikipedia editors, who joined like a gang, which have been deleting for a long time good science articles at Wikipedia, and no one seems to care to stop them. Thanks --Utad3 02:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- I see that you have been warned about this massive post, so I won't add any further information than is already above. (aeropagitica) 03:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- This same user has spammed Wikipedia twice anonymously as 213.58.99.22 with links to copies of its articles on Creation: The Physical Truth and Harold Aspden at PowerPedia - please see User talk:213.58.99.22 and Special:Contributions/213.58.99.22 for details. -- Jeff G. 17:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- It was a token of my appreciation to the editors who supported my position. Now, for sure I will have to take long compulsive Wiki vacations :) Goodbye. --Utad3 17:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- This same user Utad3 has also spammed Wikipedia many times in its own right - please see all of the "Asking for your aid" Contributions dated 1 January 2007 on Special:Contributions/Utad3 for details. -- Jeff G. 18:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- This issue - derived from the abusive deletion nomination of the two articles mentioned in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Aspden and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation: The Physical Truth - was already discussed above with the Wiki administrators Asterion and (aeropagitica) : as I told before, I was not aware at the time. Curiously, you don't even mention the long hours of contributions that I had to spend in the edition of those two articles in order to provide the most accurate and sourced data. What more can you possibly want from me now? --Utad3 20:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- "The result was delete. Proto::► 11:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC)" per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 January 2#Creation: The Physical Truth. Please note that the link will get you close, but the quote is one line above the link, so you may have to scroll up. This situation is an artifact of the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion logging process. -- Jeff G. 14:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
