Talk:Utah State Route 128

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Utah State Route 128 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics Utah State Highways
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.

[edit] GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The comment about U.S. 89 in Arizona could stand to be parenthetical.
I agree, this sentence stuck out. I tried to smooth and re-order the content better in this paragraph. Hopefully this fixed the issue. If not please advise on how to best do this.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    It may be common knowledge, but the river road should be cited if it's commonplace. Where did the information about the King's Toll Road come from?
Done
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Great pics. There are almost too many - maybe one too many.
Removed one photo and re-ordered the rest.
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Great article overall. —Rob (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the review and kind words. I have responded to all your comments.Davemeistermoab (talk) 01:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
All right, I feel it meets the criteria now. —Rob (talk) 20:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)