Talk:USS Hunchback (1852)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

USS Hunchback (1852) was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: May 1, 2008

This article has a deprecated, subst'ed or incorrect infobox and needs a new one. Please replace with {{Infobox Ship Begin/doc}}

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
B	rated as B-Class on the assessment scale
Mid	rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): American Civil War task force

An entry from USS Hunchback (1852) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on November 13, 2006.

[edit] GA-Failed

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I'm sorry, but I am going to have to fail this article. For one, there are only 3 references, and each paragraph should be referenced. Also, the article is very short and does not contain enough information. It is very well written, however, and it is a good start to a good article, but renominate it once these issues have been dealt with. Cheers, ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line}§ 13:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)