User talk:Usman Farooq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Usman Farooq: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 22:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sock puppetry

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Usman Farooq for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Ravikiran 11:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Usman Farooq, and you are therefore blocked for period of five days.
You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires.

IolakanaT 18:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gunsights?

I've upped you to an indefinite block for death threats: [1]. -- Samir धर्म 09:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is totally unfair. I have signed up for wikipedia with my real name and my real email address. With a purpose of useful contributions. I urge anyone considering this case to read up my contributions to wikipedia and it will be evident from them that I have a positive attitude and my contributions are worth something. I am accused of sockpuppetry on the basis that someone signed his posts with my name (though it must be considered that this is a common name). The person who has blocked my account said, "Comes out of nowehere, signs as you and has personal attacks in the edit summary. Pretty clear to me." What is this? if someone posts insults with my name I will be blocked? Anyone and I mean anyone can do that. Ok I can weather the insult of being blocked for five days, but then someone comes around and blocks me indefinatly. For heaven's sake this is my account with my real name, I have been making most productive contributions and I get blocked for indefinate period of time? I mean this is down right insulting. And all based on what evidence? Someone signed with my name? No one is stupid enought to sign insults with their own name if they are tying to hide. This is my first and only account on wikipedia and it is totally unfair to block such an account indefinately on such week evidence. Also I am a new user and based on my contributions I think I deserve a better treatment. Please consider all this carefully and talk to the people blocking me to be a little more discreet."


Decline reason: "I have requested a checkuser, which will settle the case unequivocally. Please bear with us while this is in process. Note that the attacks by the other user were very serious, so this must be taken seriously. Thank you for your patience."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Death threats against fellow contributors are not acceptable on Wikipedia under any circumstances. Daniel.Bryant 01:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unblocked

I have unblocked you; a couple of us have reviewed the evidence and we agree that this was almost certainly a case of mistaken identity. Thank you for your patience, and pleae accept my apologies for the time it took to clear this up. I have notified Samir, who originally blocked you, as a courtesy, but I suspect that there will be no further problem here. Guy 07:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)