User talk:User1389/Archive 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Flag of Serbia

Stop your edit-war. It is meaningless to push for your own POV when there has been an agreement which solved the issue. Nikola Smolenski, Duje and others at Talk:Flag of Serbia and commons:Image talk:Flag of Serbia.svg agreed to uphold the Constitution of Serbia on this. I repeat. Stop and do not revert any more. The flag in front the UN building is placed at its proper place. commons:Image:Flags of Serbia.jpg should be in the place at which I placed it. -- Imbris (talk) 21:35, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

What is wrong with having two of Serbia's flag instead of just one. This "high" in the article we discuss both of flags. Lower in the article under the portion of State flag we can discuss particularities and particular flag images which are according to the text which the image describes. -- Imbris (talk) 02:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Have I not been apsolutelly clear about this. The Constitution of Serbia describes the Flag of Serbia as existing in two forms. In the opening sentences of the article we describe both of those National and State Flag. This is why the image Flags of Serbia.jpg is used. In the part of the article where only one (State) is described, only that one is hence used. Stop your revertments because they are needless and damaging the article. Not mentioning our coleagual relationship. -- Imbris (talk) 20:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

What's this with you and flags Imbris? :-) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 08:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, I know. Look at Talk:List of flags of Montenegro. There are several unsourced flags which he's pushing, one sourced by 2 websites who falsely source their own source (and obviously wrong) (Image talk:Princely Standard of Danilo I of Montenegro.png) and another which he invented himself (Image talk:PrincedomMNEdi.PNG). He also doesn't allow new data inserted into the articles; he quickly resorts to criticism of other users and sources, but sadly doesn't pay much attention to his own - himself's standing far weaker than that; which would imply that he thinks he's somehow superior to ol' inferior me. He also doesn't honor previously-achieved compromises. I think that there are some personal motivations in his acts, and I have no idea how we'll be able to transgress this.

P.S. Please use English only. Thanks. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

About not responding - well yeah, that's what he did to me, and "claim" some of the articles I were editing as his personal own. The tactic you should use is - avoid edit wars at all costs, they're inconstructive. Put up a message at the corresponding talk pages and his own personal. If it continues, put up a tag on the article if you need it be. If it remains that way - head over to the administrators' board and report this matter. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)