Template talk:UserWUSTLproject

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shortcut:
WP:WUSTL
Maintained The following user(s) are actively involved with this article and may be able to help with questions about verification and sources:
Lmbstl (talk • contribs • email)
This in no way implies article ownership; all editors are encouraged to contribute.
WikiProject Washington University in St. Louis
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Washington University in St. Louis. If you would like to help, you can edit this article or visit the Washington University in St. Louis WikiProject page, where you can join the project and contribute to the discussion.
NA This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the quality scale.
To-do list for Template:UserWUSTLproject: edit · history · watch · refresh

Here are some tasks you can do:


    [edit] Picture and font change

    I changed the picture and the font, and hope that this change is ok. - thank you Astuishin 23:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

    The pic is a good one, but now it is different from the image on thee WUSTL project. I used the same images to provide some visual consistency. Also, the building faces away from the text in the infobox-- if we want to be overly-particular, facades of buildings (as well as portraits of people) should face toward the text they refer to-- kind of a basic design rule. It certainly does not look bad; I am just wondering what you had in mind when you changed it. Kindly, Lmbstl 10:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
    You make a valid point Lmbstl, think if I contact the user on wikimedia to provide these images that they might be able to upload others. I did not realize the placement of the picture however, now that you mention it I it should be replaced. Thank you for pointing that out. Again thank for you for all of your efforts to improve the article. I hope to add more content intend of focus on simply the aesthetics, I'm nearing the end of a history section for the Washington U. page. - thank you Astuishin 06:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
    I think the replacement pic looks great! I like wikipedia because it is a joint effort, and I am excited to see how this unfolds in the next few months. --Lmbstl 09:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)