Talk:Used book

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should the unreferenced article Reading copy be merged into this article? There seems to be too little content in each to have two separae articles. Edison 05:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Support. Reading copy is little more than a dicdef and it's difficult to see how it could ever be more. Barnabypage 12:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Support Reading copy definitely falls under used book and has no reason to be its own article. Boccobrock 21:09, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Send both to Wiktionary. This page boils down to "A used book is a book which has been used and can be found in a used bookstore." They are both rather self-evident definitions, not encyclopedia topics. Replace the pages with a soft-redirect to the appropriate Wiktionary page. Rossami (talk) 16:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

There is a great deal more that could go on this page, though, while that doesn't strike me as true of reading copy. Barnabypage (talk) 13:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)