User talk:USAD ACADECA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You must be joking. What you consider "vandalism" of the Dorsey High School article is nothing more than removing overt nonsense. If you think you have to, ban me by all means. But I think you'll find that you won't have much support for your position. In any event, empty threats don't concern me. 76.124.78.88 (talk) 03:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:76.124.78.88 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 03:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Susan Miller Dorsey High School

Regarding your recent edit to this article[1]. Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia which is written from a neutral point of view and should only contain reliably sourced, verifiable information. I do not think that the material you have added necessarily meets with these conditions and I have reverted your edit. Please note Wikipedia is not a soapbox or a publisher of original thought. The threshold for inclusion is verifiability not truth. For more infromation on Wikipedia's fundamental principles see Wikipedia:Five pillars, for help using and editing Wikipedia see Help:Contents or to contact me on my talk page go here. I hope that we can come to a resolution on the issue, regards Guest9999 (talk) 05:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Inform of WP:3RR violation (Susan Miller Dorsey High School)

Following my previous post I think I should inform you that you have broken the three-revert rule by reverting changes made to an article more than three times in a 24 hour period ([2], [3], [4], [5]). Typically users are blocked for breaking the three-revert rule (see Wikipedia:Three-revert rule#Enforcement; however since you are a new user and were likely not aware of the rule or warned that you could breach it, it is unlikely that any action will be taken. You should though consider this a warning, further reverts could well lead to you being reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR and blocked. If you want the article to be returned to the state after you last edited it I suggest you bring it up on the talk page of the article here or at the Administrators' noticeboard. Guest9999 (talk) 06:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)