Talk:USAA/Archive09

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Content removed.

Pictures of Davis' children WILL NOT be posted on Wikipedia in any event. If they are posted again, they WILL BE removed.

Content removed.

New Discussion Beginning March 12, 2006

What we have here, above, is a clearly orchestrated and organized effort by a large group of people who are acting in concert to suppress the dissemination of information. I strongly urge the rent-a-shills who make no contribution and express no opinion - but who act in concert to intimidate and suppress the expression of what they acknowledge to be one person who is expressing a considered and well researched opinion - I strongly suggest that you read these Federal Statutes:

18 USC § 1951 [Hobbs Act]
18 USC § 241 [Conspiracy Against Rights]
18 USC § 242 [Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law]
18 USC § 245 [Federally Protected Activities]

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Interlocutor 1 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 13 March 2006.

Whoever you are, you have a misguided understanding of what the wikipedia and what free speech are. --Jason (talk) 03:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Content removed.

Dude, are you talking to yourself? (post is from same ISP as previous anon Koenig sockpuppets). --Mmx1 16:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

see bottom of Mmx1 dude-man's page to unravel the IP mystery

Oh, so you know Verizon's not his ISP? How'd you know which ISP Koenig's using? --Mmx1 03:27, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Content removed.

No, I don't need to go by the IP address. You've heard of this thing called the edit history? It's very revealing. I'll admit I may have been wrong about 66.171.61.143, but come on, "Koenig, why do you hate America?". There's only one participant on this page that'll resort to such ridiculous language. The same one that accused me of violating their Civil Rights.

I'm not stupid enough to reveal details about myself on wiki. Too many nutcases on the internet. But I'll just say that I have no personal stake or dealings with USAA. I only got involved in this as a result of the AFD on your fork.

--Mmx1 16:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Content removed.

Uh huh.....show me where I said I knew where you live? I don't care whose ISP you use. I do care who you are, because your patterns indicate you're the same individual as the user Robert Koenig, who was permanently banned from wikipedia. BTW, it's a small leap from talking about yourself in the third person, as you are, to talking to yourself. The article DOES state that USAA, in its insurance capacity, operates as an unincorporated inter-insurance exchange. However, it is not solely an insurance exchange. The rest of the allegations against Robert. G. Davis in the reverts you keep trying to make....that's between you and him. --Mmx1 17:32, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Content removed.


You call this encyclopedic?

Content removed.

--Mmx1 17:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Content removed.

I made the change regarding Koenig being an alleged criminal because of 1) the same being applied to the parties of his interest being so labeled, in spite of no charges ever being filed against them and 2) charges actually having been filed against Koenig. It makes sense, because even one of Koenig's aliases/shills said so in the archived discussion (ref: stalking of children).

It really is too bad that Koenig is so afraid of his shadow that he won't comment himself here. Or maybe, he isn't afraid and just can't agree with the comments being made about him by the anonymous poster(s).

[Note: any response to my post here needs either to be seperated AND marked by the respondent or lost in reversion (depending on the choice of actions of the respondent).]

LeyteWolfer 21:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Content removed.

Questions for Kwai

1) Regarding the Kurt Eichenwald book on USAA: what is the working title for this book and what is your source for its future print? I thought he was writing a title based upon his December '05 internet porn article.

2) Who are you? Or, to appear less aggressive than that sounds, are you involved with Koenig? That last posting implies that you are not him (not a sockpuppet) and that maybe you are an outside observer (that's my assumption), like most Wikipedians here, rather than a Koenig shill. Are you involved in the Eichenwald book?

Content removed.

  • You seem like a nice enough guy. This is not the forum for your arguments. It never was and never will be. Unfortunately, idiots like me keep responding to you and validating your idea that this is the correct forum. Bob, I hope you make out OK with all the legal issues but please remember that no one cares. For all of the ranting you do they will always end up archived on the talk page never to be read again. Update your blog and try another approach. I wish you all the best.--Looper5920 13:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Content removed.

    • I just think your time would be better spent doing something other that worrying about a big multinational corporation. Go to a ballgame, climb Kilimanjaro, do something. (Then again it is not my place to tell you what to do with your time.) If you do not like the company or the way they conduct business then pull your money out and go somewhere else. Thanks for the last reply about Google hits though. Now at least I know your reasoning. Yes, the squeaky wheel does get the grease. I'd say Semper Fi but I'm ashamed to admit you used to be a Marine--Looper5920 14:22, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Bob they are suggesting you need to get a life. Maybe another hobby, a girlfriend, something?? You need to let it go and live your life. Switch banks and get on with it. That is the beauty of the free market--Looper5920 12:59, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Content removed.