User talk:Urvabara

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Proposed deletion of DDR4 SDRAM

[edit] DDR4 SDRAM

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article DDR4 SDRAM, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. 202.40.157.145 06:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to List of vaporware

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to List of vaporware, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 16:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi and thanks! Please, just read the articles: HD DVD, DVD-RW DL, DVD+RW DL, LaTeX3. Urvabara (talk) 16:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but none of these articles even mention the subject being vaporware; Wikipedia is in no position of authority to accuse something of being "vaporware". If there are no significant reliable sources calling something vaporware then Wikipedia cannot say this.

Also note that Wikipedia does not aim for long exhaustive lists, because (in my opinion at least) the longer the list, the less useful and the less usable it is (WP:NOT also suggests this vaguely). -- intgr [talk] 20:06, 19 May 2008 (UTC)