User talk:Urenio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I advise you to add some references supporting the notability of the URENIO project , from third party reliable published sources outside your university and sponsors. Otherwise the articles is extre3meley likely to be deleted. 00:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] URENIO

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article URENIO, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of URENIO. KrakatoaKatie 07:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

It is not correct that "References are not about this group but are instead about the terms in the article". All the six references are about the group.

The issue of deleting this article was already discussed and resolved with previous WP editors: see, Shalom (20 August 2007); Evil Spartan (20 August 2007); Smackboat (20 August 2007); see also the first comment on this page(00:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC). This article has been proposed for deletion by Shalom (20 August 2007)and it was retained after its revision. The policy of Wikipedia is that "Articles that Have previously been proposed for deletion; Have previously been undeleted; Have been discussed on AfD or MfD; are not candidates for the prod template. It is not very productive to come again on the same issue.