User talk:Update27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Soccermeko (talk • contribs • block log • [http://en.wikipedia.org../../../../articles/l/o/g/Special%7ELog_01d8.html).  As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Just because I edit the Nicole Wray first does not make me sockpuppet of whoever. You need to be block for damaging the page. It's members like that, that make Wikipedia look bad. You can not prove what is untrue. So I request an unblock."

Decline reason: "The apparent personal attack/incivility makes me not want to unblock at this time. Come up with a more temperate unblock request, please, and above all, don't panic. Declined (for now). — Jéské (v^_^v Karistaa Usko) 00:54, 18 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  • Like I said to Kww, Wikipedia is free to any who wants to contribute. Update27 (talk) 00:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock Again

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Before I began editting, I stated that I was not a sockpuppet. I knew you would blame for that. And again, honestly I am not a sockpuppet of Soccermeko. Update27 (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Not a sock? Your contributions prove otherwise. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 18:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Comment Contributions prove nothing. If someone else did the same thing to you, you wouldn't like it. I will not be turned over because of your false belief. Update27 (talk) 18:33, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Would you please stop? If you did the following things:
  • Opened a new account - don't apply
  • Didn't touch a Nicole Wray article for 9 months or so - don't apply
  • Followed the rules, and only used well sourced material, and included citations - wrong person
  • Learned English well enough that we couldn't recognize you by your bad grammar - don't apply
then probably no one would ever know it was you, and, if you really wanted to contribute, no one would stop you. - Fails approval
Kww (talk) 19:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Now something for you, would you please stop the following?
Shut Up
You learn to respect
Learn good English
Stop misnaming people
Any can edit the page and contribute whether you like it or not
And this is my first account, so what you talking about
I know going on. You don't like to see the page editted by no one. Which why you blame innocent users like me to a sockpuppet. And then you say
"Well your edits prove other wise"
Face the fact that you were wrong and that you hate Nicole Wray. Because I going help that page and I don't care what you say. If you don't want nobody to edit it then delete it. Because it a disgrace and a shame that you add all the wrong information. Your stupid edits are out of control. Update27 (talk) 16:22, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My Contributions

And if my contributions were not accept, why were they added to the page. Me and lateupdate26 found that stuff(Reverbnation and Sta Bizzi Entertainment). If you don't need help adding on to the page, then take that off the page and find your own links and references instead of using mine. That why I don't like helping out a lot because you steal other people contributions and take the credits. Update27 (talk) 16:29, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Block notice and unblock declination

Please do not remove the block notice and/or unblock declination again. If you do so, your talk page will be protected and you will not be able to edit it. --Geniac (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)