Talk:Untriennium
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by the Elements WikiProject, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details. This article has also been selected for the Version 0.5 release of Wikipedia. |
||
 |
This article is also supported by WikiProject Chemistry. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ] |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
|
Help with this template Please rate this article, and then leave comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify its strengths and weaknesses. |
|
[edit] Name
I will hereby a name carium (Km). Cosmium 22:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC) Seeing the extended Periodic Table it seems that the speed of light may not be the ultimate speed .Also it may bring forward some new and exciting concepts in atomic chemistry Akshay...ManUnited rocks 05:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Delete?
Why is every element up to Untriennium have a page when Ununoctium is the last element listed on standard periodic tables? Nothing beyond Ununoctium has been discovered, it's all speculation. I think this page was created a little too early. 207.190.244.74 (talk) 13:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- I think you are right. Speculation about heavy elements can be included if that speculation has been published in the scientific literature, but not just because someone who did a trivial calculation using the wrong equation and thought the result notable. --Itub (talk) 13:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
