User talk:Unscathed310

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Linda Kasabian, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Greenguy1090 02:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I cannot give you a clear answer. What I can tell you is that anybody can add a template and anybody can remove it, but these actions should not be arbitrary but based on certain criteria. Concerning the references, read here. Concerning the tone and the style read here and, in particular, here. Now, IMO, the first tag could be disputed. Although there are some uncited claims, the article includes a reasonable amount of inline citations. In order to be completely sure about your actions before removing this tag, make sure that each paragraph has at least one inline citation with verifiable and reliable sources. Concerning the second tag, I think the article needs a lot of work, because the tone is not encyclopedic, and, therefore, the tag should stay there, informing the reader and inviting for help. If you want more suggestions concerning the style, the tone, and the prose in general, you could go to the League of Copyeditors. Cheers!--Yannismarou (talk) 13:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)