User talk:Universe=atom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 [edit] Excessive linkingThank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Taj Mahal, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Greswik 19:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [edit] Excessive linking and referencingDear Universe=atom, Your enthusiasm is appreciated, but your linking (in Taj Mahal) and referencing (on the India page) are both excessive. Please read WP:MOS for a guide to editing. Thanks! Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Blanking Your Own Talk PageDear Universe=atom, It is generally considered bad form to blank (or delete content from) your own talk page, unless there is offensive language in a post. The usual custom on WP is to archive post, when a large number has accumulated, not to delete them as you did here. Thanks. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 11:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikilinksYour wikilinks in Taj Mahal were not in keeping with the Wiki standards. Please see the manual of style for guidelines. WP:MOS. Thank you.--Nemonoman 14:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC) A more specific guideline may be found here: WP:CONTEXT--Nemonoman 14:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC) [edit] HiHi! I see you have been editing India-related articles quite a lot, and also have participated in WP:INCOTW nomination procedure. History of India will probably be next week's INCOTW. We hope to improve the article substantially. At present, the article is dingy and lacks inline citations. Please continue your edits, but please also read the wikipedia guidelines (as mentioned in previous posts in your talk pages). Meanwhile, you can try editing Education in India which is this week's INCOTW. Here are some links you may be interested in:
Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC) [edit] Official welcome[edit] Welcome!Hello, Universe=atom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! —Dwaipayan (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[edit] Sock accounts ?Hi Universe=Atom, Can you please let us know if you are also using the Johnsmithcba account since, as Fowler&fowler pointed out [1] your edit patterns are suspiciously similar, and are reminiscent of sockpuppeteer Nikkul ? Also your previous blanking of your user page and recent archiving of the Talk:India page (upto and including F&F's query), do not raise confidence. So, I request you to clarify once and for all, if or if not you are Nikkul and/or Johnsmithcba. I apologize for this seeming assumption of bad faith, but the India page has recently had a bad experience with sock-puppets and no one wants to go through that again. Thanks. Abecedare 18:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:INCOTW updatedYou voted for Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, this week's Indian Collaboration of the Week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. --Dwaipayan (talk) 10:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] {{fact}} tag removalCan you explain your removal of the fact tag on India along with the misleading edit summary? Sarvagnya 18:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Added my comments to your Grammar Mistakes IIThough I didn't reply to all ur points, I did reply to a few them. --~KnowledgeHegemony~ 08:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] Welcome to WP:IndiaWelcome!
 Hi, and welcome to the India WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India. A few features that you might find helpful:
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! — Lost(talk) 14:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] WP:INCOTW updatedYou voted for History of India, this week's Indian Collaboration of the Week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] Your VandalProof ApplicationDear Universe=atom, Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel 04:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] Your comments on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Himachal PradeshYou quoted- echoing kalyang and nichalp. but now i have merly completed all what they demanded for. kindly justify your statement please. Sushant gupta (talk · contribs) 02:19, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:PrejudiceSorry, I got busy with other stuff and forgot to answer your post on my talk page. I don't have any prejudice against you. I only react to what people say or do on a page, not who they are (which in any case I don't know anything about). When you made the change on the India page which provided a link to all the names of India in different languages, I thought it was a good edit and I was quick to praise you. So, please don't think that I bear any ill-will against you (as a person). I don't. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:48, 22 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] Dont worryI dont see where they accuse you of being a sock of KH. I dont think they're accusing you of being a sock of anybody else other than John. If you're innocent, dont worry about anything. I've been through baseless accusations myself. Several checkusers have been filed against me and several users have trolled on wikipedia including an admin have taken undue advantage of it in bad faith. You will just have to be thick-skinned about it and continue to edit in good faith and contribute to the project. Also dont be scared of anyone. Policies and guidelines govern all of us. So if somebody's being rude to you or if they're throwing around baseless accusations and calling you names etc., do not mince any words in pointing out to them that they are in violation of wiki policies. If they persist, report them to an admin or on WP:ANI, but avoid stooping to their levels and responding in kind. Ping me if you need any help. Sarvagnya 18:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
On a serious note, nobody can bully you by calling you a sock without proof. If they do report them to a neutral admin. Suspicious ppl suspect everything.....that doesn't imply you need to worry about them. Let them do their work(ie. suspect) and you do your work(ie. edit). Don't let these issues stop you.But after this comment I am afraid they not further suspect 'I am Nikkul's sock' or 'he is my sock' or 'we are both socks of u' or 'you are a sock of both of us both' or 'you are a sock of me and i m a sock of Nikkul' 'or maybe I am a sock you and you are a sock of Nikkul' or 'we all our socks of someone else'. I'll talk to Fowler&Fowler abt this whole wrangle.KnowledgeHegemony 10:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] Infobox of China articleThe China article is a civilizational article focusing mostly on Chinese historical and cultural themes leading up to the modern nation-states. For the infobox and the modern nation-state commonly called China, see the People's Republic of China article. --JakeLM 06:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC) [edit] INCOTW updatedYou voted for Sport in India, this week's Indian Collaboration of the Week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. [edit] Your VandalProof ApplicationThank you for your interest in VandalProof, Universe=atom. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this you have little experience vandalfighting. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. «Snowolf How can I help?» 10:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] Style editsHi U=A, I noticed that you often spell out centuries (eg. 18th-> eighteenth with edit summary "18th should be eighteenth"). Can you please clarify which wikipedia style guide you are following, since WP:DATE contains no such injunction, or even specify a preference, and gives examples for both uses ? Furthermore, you'll note that Eighteenth century is in fact a redirect to 18th century! Note too that not using a serial comma is not a grammatical error and the wikipedia MoS allows its use/non-use as long as ambiguity is avoided. That aside, in this edit you changed the punctuation within quoted text, which is a no-no unless there is a strong justification for doing so (and even in that case the reader needs to be told that the quoted text has been tampered). Finally note that according to WP:NUM#Numbers_in_words, "Whole numbers from zero to ten should be spelled out", while, "Numbers above ten may be written out if they are expressed in two or fewer words" (emphasis added). I point this out simply because your edit summary here was incorrect, even though the edit itself was fine. Hope you'll treat the above comments as friendly pointers rather than admonishments. I just thought it would be better to explain my reasoning for undoing some of your edits in detail here, rather than in a 4-5 word edit summary. Cheers. Abecedare 19:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Taj FPC and Wonders of the WorldHi, I noticed that someone had queried, "What wonders might that be?" in reference to the Taj Mahal (in the WP:FPC section). Although it is commonly said that the Taj (or the Great Wall of China) is one of the Seven Wonders, the more common Seven Wonders are the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World (i.e. the seven wonders of classical antiquity), a list that did not include the Taj. You might want to change your post to one of the lists on the "Seven Wonders" page above to which the Taj does belong (Medieval, or Tourist). No big deal though. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 19:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] Your help desk messageHello, I am a recent edits' patroller. While patrolling, I obviously come upon vandals, the edits of whom I of course revert. I was wondering, though, if I am allowed to give a warning to a vandal (such as the ones in Wp:vandal#Warnings) even though I am not an administrator. I was wondering this because on the warnings, it states that "...if you continue, you will be blocked..." Obviously, since I am not an admin, I do not have the ability to block users, but on the warnings, it looks that I can do so. So, am I allowed to give out these warnings? Also, please reply on my talk page instead of here. Thank you. Universe=atom•Talk•Contributions• 16:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your UsernameI like very much your username, and I read its explanation on your userpage, which is very true! Happy editing, ♠Tom@sBat 22:12, 8 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] INCOTW updatedYou voted for History of India, this week's Indian Collaboration of the Week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.--Dwaipayan (talk) 09:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] Etymology of your user nameHi, i came across your page via FPC, and i thought i should point out a flaw in the 'Etymology' section of your user page. According to the law of conservation of matter, atoms are only preserved for basic chemical reactions. Once you get into nuclear reactions ( which i thought you guys would be familiar with ;), see India_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction ), this does not apply and atoms are split all the time. Anyway i just though i'd let you know. [edit] Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] SignatureWould you please remove the html code from your signature? It is quite distracting, and per WP:SIG, this type of signature is not acceptable. Please remove the colors and html codes, to make your signature less distracting. Thank you. --Ragib 19:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] Erie
[edit] Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] See alsoI've noticed on many FACs that you advise the addition of a See also section, which goes against the WP:MOS, specifically WP:LAYOUT#See also. Ideally, any links worth having should be incorporated into the text, and many well-written articles have no See also section for that reason; your advice to add a See also section is confusing and often incorrect. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC) [edit] Zhou Tong article FA stuffI have finished reformatting the references and corrected other problems voiced by you and other editors on the Zhou Tong (archer) page. Please review it once more and tell me what other changes are to be made before it can pass FA. Thanks. (Ghostexorcist 07:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC))
[edit] Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] ASAP help needed with Saturn article{{helpme}} Within the last few edits that I did to the Saturn article, something went wrong, and the last three sections are not showing even though they are in the edit box when you are editing the article. Please visit the article ASAP and help me fix it. Thank you. Universe=atomTalk•Contributions 14:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, since you've been working hard in improving the article, I have a little request. I have been working really hard on this same article on Simple wiki, and a few bits of information in this article are unsourced, particularly the section about the Rings and I'm having trouble finding sources for that. Maybe if you could be able to find references here and maybe at simple wiki too, that will be great. Thank you. RaNdOm26 14:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Aston Villa F.C.Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Aston Villa F.C. I have updated the article as per your comments. Any further comments would be welcome. Thanks Woodym555 23:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] Congrats!!!Congrats on getting the article on India in Simple Englsh Wikipedia promoted to Very Good Article! KnowledgeHegemony 15:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] BrazilThank you for the vote. Felipe C.S ( talk ) 19:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] my edits on Indiamay i know the good reason why did you reverted the edits i made on the page? the factual source was reliable and the statement i wrote was just to make the section more comprehensive. please justify your comments. Sushant gupta 10:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] Re:Saturn FACThanks for the notification, and yes I'll use the new refs well in Simple. Keep up the great work on the article. RaNdOm26 16:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC) [edit] UA, could you have a look at ref 7 in Saturn?Your most recent referencing put most of the material in the article in the reference section. I've put a fix on it, but its left ref 7 with no information. Serendipodous 15:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] Great job on SaturnThanks for ALL of your help in getting Saturn promoted to FA status! :) Great job! -Sarfa 20:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] Seriously though, congratulations on SaturnGreat job getting the topic one step closer to where it should be. I would suggest you reword your congratulations messages though- they read like you're congratulating yourself. Serendipodous 16:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:43, 4 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Geology of solar terrestrial planetsi created this page on 4th August 2007, and now i have nominated the page for FAC. please support at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Geology of solar terrestrial planets. If any thing needs to be worked out then do tell me before hand. thanks, Sushant gupta 12:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] Thank you for voting for "Future"in ACID Freiberg has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! [edit] Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 21:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 05:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 21:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:54, 18 September 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC) [edit] Signpost updated for October 03, 2007
Automatically delivered by COBot 03:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC) [edit] ACID AtomThe article Atom, which you voted for the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive on August 12, and was removed on September 11, because on one got around to choosing it as the winner, has been renominated and needs votes. Zginder 15:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC) [edit] spam warning
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
