User talk:Unitysuci

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] eh?

You have said: "Any way User:59.91.253.11 must restrict himself from doing a mess in the document." What document have you in mind, boy? 59.91.253.187 (talk) 12:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Unblock request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Never was this account used to do vandalism. It is unfortunate that this address is considered as a puppet of Suciindia. This address is of yet another individual."


Decline reason: "It was used to do edits in violation of our conflict of interest policy. And see the CheckUser caseDaniel Case (talk) 14:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "There was never a discussion on the conflict of interest. The user was falsely blamed of abuse and vandalism. Editors can check that this user never did vandalism. It was a puppet of User: Kuntan who did the vandalism and this user was only fixing it to its earlier condition that was mostly agreed upon by various editors."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.